2004
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.42.3.1003-1011.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable and Noncompetitive RNA Internal Control for Routine Clinical Diagnostic Reverse Transcription-PCR

Abstract: Clinical diagnostic tests based on nucleic acid amplification assist with the prompt diagnosis of microbial infections because of their speeds and extremely low limits of detection. However, the design of appropriate internal controls for such assays has proven difficult. We describe a reaction-specific RNA internal control for diagnostic reverse transcription (RT)-PCR which allows extraction, RT, amplification, and detection to be monitored. The control consists of a G؉C-rich (60%) RNA molecule with an extens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
27
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mengovirus (Comelli et al 2008;Costafreda et al 2006;da Silva et al 2007) and the feline calicivirus (Mattison et al 2009a) have been proposed as sample process controls for food and environmental virology samples. Many control systems assess only the final detection step and evaluate potential inhibition (Casas et al 2007;Dingle et al 2004;Escobar-Herrera et al 2006;Hoorfar et al 2003;Hoorfar et al 2004;La Rosa et al 2007;Medici et al 2005). It is possible to detect an internal amplification control even though the extraction procedure has failed, for example by an error that reduces the quality of the extracted RNA.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mengovirus (Comelli et al 2008;Costafreda et al 2006;da Silva et al 2007) and the feline calicivirus (Mattison et al 2009a) have been proposed as sample process controls for food and environmental virology samples. Many control systems assess only the final detection step and evaluate potential inhibition (Casas et al 2007;Dingle et al 2004;Escobar-Herrera et al 2006;Hoorfar et al 2003;Hoorfar et al 2004;La Rosa et al 2007;Medici et al 2005). It is possible to detect an internal amplification control even though the extraction procedure has failed, for example by an error that reduces the quality of the extracted RNA.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noncompetitive IPC, however, uses a completely separate target that does not directly compete with the target amplicon and has a different set of primers and probe not shared with the target amplicon for its amplification. The IPC for RRT-PCR can be introduced in a variety of ways, including transcribed RNA, armored RNA, inactivated virus, or plasmid DNA (1,6,9,10,12,14,19,27,28,31). In all cases, the IPC can be monitored in the same reaction by resolving the products on an agarose gel or using different fluorescent probes in a multiplex format with RRT-PCR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the noncompetitive IC strategy, separate primer pairs are used to detect the control and the target of interest. This approach is attractive because a noncompetitive IC could be used as a universal control for the detection of different RNA targets (6,7). However, amplification of such a control may not accurately reflect the amplification of the target due to differences in the amplification efficiencies between them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these purposes, noncompetitive ICs and competitive ICs (CICs) have been described (2,5,6,7,8,9,14,25,32). In the noncompetitive IC strategy, separate primer pairs are used to detect the control and the target of interest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%