2018
DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201800462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable Carbenes or Betaines?

Abstract: The anisotropy effect in 1H NMR spectroscopy can be readily employed to indicate the position of carbene/betaine mesomeric equilibria. NR2 substituted carbene/betaines tend to adopt betaine structures, whereas in the absence of NR2 substituents, the betaine structures cannot stabilise the structure through both π‐donation effects of the NMe2 groups and the electronegativity of the nitrogen atoms, and the corresponding carbene‐like structures are preferred. These conclusions are supported by calculated bond ord… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The simple reason therefore proves to be remarkable stabilization via resonance contributor 4 ′ in Scheme . Generally, π‐electron delocalization in ring moieties is most effective in stabilization of the studied ylide ( 1,2‐ and 1,3‐betaine ) structures (see previous studies and vide infra).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The simple reason therefore proves to be remarkable stabilization via resonance contributor 4 ′ in Scheme . Generally, π‐electron delocalization in ring moieties is most effective in stabilization of the studied ylide ( 1,2‐ and 1,3‐betaine ) structures (see previous studies and vide infra).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…They are 5‐membered ring 1,3‐betaines (no uncharged resonance structure can be drawn) with one nitrogen atom aside the electron‐deficient carbon atom and, as in the case of 5 , enjoying stabilization via the participating resonance contributors 5 ′ (Scheme ) . Both −I and +M substituent effects of the adjacent N atom, obviously, are of dominating influence on the low field position of the δ( 13 C)/ppm values of 5 and 6 compared with 4 ; stabilization via π‐electron delocalization should be similar in 4 to 6 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…σ* C1−O7 ). [4] There is one earlier manuscript dealing with 1,4transannular effects in 4-substituted cyclohexanol on the present conformational equilibrium (determined by line width measurements of the R 2 C(OH)H proton signal in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra at room temperature); [5] the axial conformation of the OH substituent increases with the electron attracting ability of C-4 substitution. [5] Steric destabilization of the axial conformer with increasing 1,3-diaxial interactions has been observed in various aliphatic cyclohexyl esters (−O−COAlk), [6] and the effect of hyperconjugation in 1,4-disubstituted cyclohexanes due to the polar effect of the second −OR substituent in 4position proved to be 0.5-0.7 kcal/mol (−OR= −OMe, −OEt, −Oiso-Pr, −Otert-Bu) [6] and 0.3-0.5kcal/mol (−OR =−OCOMe, −OCOEt, −OCOiso-Pr, −OCOtert-Bu), [3] respectively, preferring by this energy amount the axial conformation of the −OR substituent at cyclohexyl.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2). 4 Compared (cf. Scheme 2) with the corresponding cyclohexyl derivatives 2 (−ΔG°= 0.39 kcal/mol), the content of the axial conformer 1ax proves to be higher (−ΔG°= 0.02 kcal/ mol), however, compared with the corresponding cyclohexanone ester 4, on the other hand, 4ax is still more preferred (−ΔG°= −0.46 kcal/mol and this by about the same amount).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%