2009
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.4030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable carbon isotopes as an indicator for soil degradation in an alpine environment (Urseren Valley, Switzerland)

Abstract: Analyses of soil organic carbon (SOC) content and stable carbon isotope signatures (delta(13)C) of soils were assessed for their suitability to detect early stage soil erosion. We investigated the soils in the alpine Urseren Valley (southern central Switzerland) which are highly impacted by soil erosion. Hill slope transects from uplands (cambisols) to adjacent wetlands (histosols and histic to mollic gleysols) differing in their intensity of visible soil erosion, and reference wetlands without erosion influen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This process has been suggested by Refsnider et al (2014) to explain the low δ 13 C of around −9‰ (VPDB) in the SPCCs from the eastern Canadian Arctic. The carbon isotopic composition measured in organic material of sample STB1, around −24.1 ± 0.2‰ (1σ), is fully consistent with the range of the modern upland Alpine (Urseren Valley, southern central Switzerland) soil organic matter from −27 to −21‰ (Schaub and Alewell, 2009). As the soil dissolved gaseous CO 2 is usually enriched in 13 C by about 4.4‰ during diffusion compared to the soil organic matter (Davidson, 1995;Refsnider et al, 2014), if we hypothesize that the STB1 organic carbon δ 13 C is representative of the carbon source for the SPCCs, then we can calculate that the CO 2 produced during the oxidation of this organic carbon might have had an isotopic composition around −24.1 + 4.4 FIGURE 8 | Carbon and oxygen isotope values for the carbonate within samples BOS2-1A, BOS2-2, BOS3.…”
Section: Carbon and Oxygen Isotopic Signalssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This process has been suggested by Refsnider et al (2014) to explain the low δ 13 C of around −9‰ (VPDB) in the SPCCs from the eastern Canadian Arctic. The carbon isotopic composition measured in organic material of sample STB1, around −24.1 ± 0.2‰ (1σ), is fully consistent with the range of the modern upland Alpine (Urseren Valley, southern central Switzerland) soil organic matter from −27 to −21‰ (Schaub and Alewell, 2009). As the soil dissolved gaseous CO 2 is usually enriched in 13 C by about 4.4‰ during diffusion compared to the soil organic matter (Davidson, 1995;Refsnider et al, 2014), if we hypothesize that the STB1 organic carbon δ 13 C is representative of the carbon source for the SPCCs, then we can calculate that the CO 2 produced during the oxidation of this organic carbon might have had an isotopic composition around −24.1 + 4.4 FIGURE 8 | Carbon and oxygen isotope values for the carbonate within samples BOS2-1A, BOS2-2, BOS3.…”
Section: Carbon and Oxygen Isotopic Signalssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The inherent complexity behind ecosystem respiration lies behind the many contributing sources. Nowadays, studies of these components have expanded to include stem CO 2 flux, mycorrhizal and microbial contributions (Esperschütz et al, 2009), litter decomposition (Bird et al, 2008;Rubino et al, 2010), dissolved organic carbon (Sanderman and Amundson, 2008;Müller et al, 2009), erosion (Schaub and Alewell, 2009), soil organic matter dynamics (Klumpp et al, 2007;Kayler et al, 2011) and CO 2 storage in soil air and solution (Gamnitzer et al, 2011). Labelling has also played a central role in achieving a higher level of certainty in observing single source temporal patterns (Ubierna et al, 2009;Powers and Marshall, 2011).…”
Section: Recent Findings On Component Sources and Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…δ 13 C) and nitrogen (i.e. δ 15 N) served as useful tools to determine sources and sinks of carbon, nitrogen or sediments (Alewell et al, 2008;Buck and Monger, 1999;Papanicolaou et al, 2003;Schaub and Alewell, 2009;Turnbull et al, 2008;Fox and Papanicolaou, 2007;Jacinthe et al, 2009). They are also useful for process identification and even process quantification (Conen et al, 2007(Conen et al, , 2008.…”
Section: K Meusburger Et Al: Stable Isotopes and Fallout Radionuclimentioning
confidence: 99%