2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00028-015-0304-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable equilibria of a singularly perturbed reaction–diffusion equation when the roots of the degenerate equation contact or intersect along a non-smooth hypersurface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We still need to prove that u (1) 0 and u (2) 0 (see Theorem 1) are isolated L 1 -local minimizers of E 0 , which corresponds to item (iii) of Theorem 2. This proof can be performed in a similar way to that in [16,Theorem 3.9]. Although the problems are different, the key similarity is that, in both cases, the weight function in the functional Γ-limit (function  in our case) vanishes on a hypersurface 𝛾 ⊂ Ω.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We still need to prove that u (1) 0 and u (2) 0 (see Theorem 1) are isolated L 1 -local minimizers of E 0 , which corresponds to item (iii) of Theorem 2. This proof can be performed in a similar way to that in [16,Theorem 3.9]. Although the problems are different, the key similarity is that, in both cases, the weight function in the functional Γ-limit (function  in our case) vanishes on a hypersurface 𝛾 ⊂ Ω.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We still need to prove that u0false(1false)$$ {u}_0^{(1)} $$ and u0false(2false)$$ {u}_0^{(2)} $$ (see Theorem 1) are isolated L1$$ {L}^1 $$‐local minimizers of E0$$ {E}_0 $$, which corresponds to item false(iiifalse)$$ (iii) $$ of Theorem 2. This proof can be performed in a similar way to that in [16, Theorem 3.9]. Although the problems are different, the key similarity is that, in both cases, the weight function in the functional normalΓ$$ \Gamma $$‐limit (function scriptP$$ \mathcal{P} $$ in our case) vanishes on a hypersurface γnormalΩ$$ \gamma \subset \Omega $$.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When functions a, b, c intersect each other. In [9] the problem (1) was studied in an n-dimensional domain Ω with k 2 ≡ 1. It was assumed that the roots of the g (a balanced bistable function, i.e.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%