2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable individual differences in unfamiliar face identification: Evidence from simultaneous and sequential matching tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The individual differences approach can provide valuable insights about the perceptual and cognitive mechanisms underlying face identification but is a largely untapped resource 25 . Individual differences in unfamiliar face identification are reliable 25 27 and consistent across tasks that vary in the type of judgment being made (e.g., same/different vs. detecting a target in a lineup), the amount of within-person variability in appearance, and sequential versus simultaneous stimulus presentation 26 . To date, no study has examined whether individual differences in unfamiliar face matching predict improvement in performance as additional images are presented (i.e., the ability to capitalize on variability as a face becomes familiar).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The individual differences approach can provide valuable insights about the perceptual and cognitive mechanisms underlying face identification but is a largely untapped resource 25 . Individual differences in unfamiliar face identification are reliable 25 27 and consistent across tasks that vary in the type of judgment being made (e.g., same/different vs. detecting a target in a lineup), the amount of within-person variability in appearance, and sequential versus simultaneous stimulus presentation 26 . To date, no study has examined whether individual differences in unfamiliar face matching predict improvement in performance as additional images are presented (i.e., the ability to capitalize on variability as a face becomes familiar).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Images within match trials were taken using different cameras. Images in the AIFMT (half male) were colour photographs (652 × 260 pix) shown on a grey background 26 . Images were taken from a variety of sources and included natural variability in appearance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are two types of answer, one aimed at the bias differences, the other at differing abilities. Some individuals may genuinely be more cautious than others at declaring a match, for example, leading to differences in bias (Baker et al, 2023). However, there may also be distinct abilities, as indicated for example by Berger et al (2022) who report that match trials correlated with eye-processing ability, while non-match trials correlated with holistic processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%