2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-023-05387-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable isotopes and a changing world

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The integration of stable isotopes, DNAmetabarcoding, both eukaryotic and prokaryotic, has revolutionized ecological studies with echinoderms, providing valuable insights into their trophic interactions, biodiversity, and microbial associations. Stable isotopes have been instrumental in unraveling the trophic ecology of echinoderms, shedding light on their feeding habits, diet preferences, and ecological roles within marine ecosystems (González-De Zayas et al, 2020;Hobson, 2023). DNA-metabarcoding has transformed the way we assess echinoderm biodiversity, allowing for efficient species identification and revealing hidden diversity and community dynamics (Leray et al, 2013;Sinniger et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration of stable isotopes, DNAmetabarcoding, both eukaryotic and prokaryotic, has revolutionized ecological studies with echinoderms, providing valuable insights into their trophic interactions, biodiversity, and microbial associations. Stable isotopes have been instrumental in unraveling the trophic ecology of echinoderms, shedding light on their feeding habits, diet preferences, and ecological roles within marine ecosystems (González-De Zayas et al, 2020;Hobson, 2023). DNA-metabarcoding has transformed the way we assess echinoderm biodiversity, allowing for efficient species identification and revealing hidden diversity and community dynamics (Leray et al, 2013;Sinniger et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly relevant when applying isotopic approaches to global change research in deep time contexts, given that often there are time gaps in single species sample availability that can be filled only when using multi‐taxa sampling. Individual and group variability in isotopic values of mammal species (e.g., Sheppard et al., 2018; Urton & Hobson, 2005), as well as natural environmental fluctuations and associated effects on diet and trophic interactions (e.g., Selva et al., 2012) may encrypt overall patterns of temporal changes in ecosystems and related drivers, which may be revealed only when looking at more complete communities (Hobson, 2023). Indeed, the use of single species as reliable sentinels to evaluate ecosystem responses to climate change has been questioned (Reed et al., 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stable isotope analysis of tissues of sentinel species has become a powerful tool to infer patterns of environmental change in ecosystems because isotopic measurements integrate numerous processes influencing nutrient flow and trophic interactions, and show high sensitivity to changes in environmental conditions (Alp & Cucherousset, 2022; Bengtson Nash et al., 2018; Hobson, 2023; Hückstädt et al., 2017). Long‐term dietary changes in sentinel species assessed with tissue stable isotope measurements have revealed important changes in ecosystems (e.g., Blight et al., 2015; Dawson & Siegwolf, 2007; Hobson, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the use of stable isotope biogeochemistry to infer long-term changes in migratory connectivity is an important tool for ecologists ( 44 ), it can be prone to both short-term and long-term temporal variation that may influence our interpretations of these long-term shifts in connectivity. That said, short-term (annual/seasonal) variation in isotopic concentration do not appear to be reflected in animal tissues ( 45 ) and although long-term trends have been detected for some Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation (GNIP) sites we found no such trends ( SI Appendix , Table S4 ) within the seven GNIP sites situated broadly across the upper Great Lakes region (i.e., breeding region of our winter population).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%