2010
DOI: 10.1675/063.033.0106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable Isotopes Confirm Community Patterns in Foraging Among Hawaiian Procellariiformes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chicks often exhibit higher d 15 N signatures than adults, usually between 1.0 and 2.0 %, and these age differences are often quoted as an indication that adult fed their chicks with higher-trophic-level prey than they assimilated themselves (Hodum and Hobson 2000;Cherel et al 2005aCherel et al , 2008Forero et al 2005;Richoux et al 2010). Age differences in d 13 C signatures do not present any obvious trend and generally are of a smaller magnitude (less than 1 %) (Hodum and Hobson 2000;Forero et al 2005;Cherel et al 2008Bond et al 2010;Richoux et al 2010; but see Cherel et al 2005a). The uncritical interpretation of differences in chick and adult isotope levels as evidence of dietary segregation may present some problems, as explained below.…”
Section: Metabolic Issuesmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chicks often exhibit higher d 15 N signatures than adults, usually between 1.0 and 2.0 %, and these age differences are often quoted as an indication that adult fed their chicks with higher-trophic-level prey than they assimilated themselves (Hodum and Hobson 2000;Cherel et al 2005aCherel et al , 2008Forero et al 2005;Richoux et al 2010). Age differences in d 13 C signatures do not present any obvious trend and generally are of a smaller magnitude (less than 1 %) (Hodum and Hobson 2000;Forero et al 2005;Cherel et al 2008Bond et al 2010;Richoux et al 2010; but see Cherel et al 2005a). The uncritical interpretation of differences in chick and adult isotope levels as evidence of dietary segregation may present some problems, as explained below.…”
Section: Metabolic Issuesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Nitrogen stable isotopes increase in a predictable manner between trophic levels and thus indicate the trophic position of consumers (Kelly 2000;Bearhop et al 2004). Recently, SIA has provided evidence for a dietary segregation between adults and chicks in a wide range of pelagic seabirds (Hodum and Hobson 2000;Forero et al 2005;Cherel et al 2005aCherel et al , 2008Bond et al 2010;Richoux et al 2010). However, most of the mentioned studies could not assess the biological significance of the isotopic differences between adults and growing chicks (but see Cherel et al 2005a;Forero et al 2005) as isotopic fractionation differs between them, as a result of growth or nutritional stress effects (Williams et al 2007;Sears et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the western North Pacific Ocean, both δ 15 N and δ 13 C values are higher on the Japanese shelf and lower in the Oyashio current and the North Pacific Transition Zone [ 73 ]. Isotope values of seabirds follow these same geographic trends: higher among the neritic seabird guilds of the northern and eastern North Pacific Ocean [ 47 48 ] relative to the pelagic seabird guilds of the central North Pacific Ocean [ 41 ], [ 74 75 ]. In this study, Laysan albatross salvaged from Alaskan fisheries had considerably higher δ 15 N values and tended toward having higher δ 13 C values than Laysan albatross salvaged from Hawaiian fisheries, as predicted based on identifiable oceanographic gradients [ 52 54 ], [ 71 73 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Streaked shearwaters ( Calonectris leucomelas ), which are widely distributed around Japanese islands, change their foraging areas in response to seasonal changes in the marine environment [ 70 ]. There are also some studies targeting wedge-tailed shearwaters at other breeding sites [ 60 , 75 77 ]. It is known that wedge-tailed shearwaters change foraging areas and strategies depending on the purpose of foraging, whether it is provision for themselves or their chicks [ 60 , 76 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result may indicate that wedge-tailed shearwaters needed to forage for a variety of prey items or expand their foraging area, perhaps because prey biomass decreased during the rearing period [ 78 ] or the nutrient requirements of chicks changed [ 79 ]. It is known that wedge-tailed shearwaters perform dual foraging excursion, which is a combination of long and short trips [ 75 , 77 ]. Increases in prey diversity during the rearing period may be caused by dual foraging excursions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%