2012
DOI: 10.3952/physics.v52i3.2478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable isotopes in environmental investigations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data were similar to δ 13 C of EC in PM previously reported for Alert (−27.9 ± 0.8‰, 5 March 2014 to 18 March 2015) (Winiger et al, 2019). Additionally, these data fall within the range of reported δ 13 C values of particles produced by fossil fuel combustion (−24‰ to −28‰) (Andersson et al, 2015;Mašalaitė et al, 2012;Pugliese et al, 2017;Widory, 2006) and overlaps with δ 13 C values found in biomass burning aerosols (−21‰ to −29‰) (Agnihotri et al, 2011;Garbaras et al, 2015;Mouteva et al, 2015;Sang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Isotopes Of Ec In Pmsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data were similar to δ 13 C of EC in PM previously reported for Alert (−27.9 ± 0.8‰, 5 March 2014 to 18 March 2015) (Winiger et al, 2019). Additionally, these data fall within the range of reported δ 13 C values of particles produced by fossil fuel combustion (−24‰ to −28‰) (Andersson et al, 2015;Mašalaitė et al, 2012;Pugliese et al, 2017;Widory, 2006) and overlaps with δ 13 C values found in biomass burning aerosols (−21‰ to −29‰) (Agnihotri et al, 2011;Garbaras et al, 2015;Mouteva et al, 2015;Sang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Isotopes Of Ec In Pmsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For nongaseous sources, we estimate a δ 13 C of −27 ± 4‰. These include the combustion of coal with a δ 13 C of −23.4 ± 1.3‰ and of liquid fuels (gasoline, diesel, and kerosene) with estimated ranges from −23.8‰ to −31.3‰ (Andersson et al, 2015; Mašalaitė et al, 2012; Pugliese et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OC isotope ratio of ambient and diesel replicates (following the same procedure as described for NIST standard), yielded almost same values with precision again better than 1.0‰ for both types of samples (Table S1). The derived ratio values of OC for ambient and diesel exhaust aerosols (10 different samples) produced comparable results of δ 13 C ratio (-27.9 to -22.7 and -26.2 to -22.9‰, respectively) with other studies (Widory, 2006;Cao et al, 2011;Pavuluri et al, 2011;Fu et al, 2012;Kawashima and Haneishi, 2012;Mašalaitė et al, 2012, Shakya et al, 2012Mkoma et al, 2013;Kundu and Kawamura, 2014). Table 1 shows the measured isotopic values for aerosols of different origin.…”
Section: Carbon Isotopic Ratio Measurementsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Most European source apportionment studies to date have focused on Western Europe. However, sources of carbonaceous aerosols in Eastern Europe can differ from Western Europe (G� orka et al, 2014;Masalaite et al, 2012;Widory, 2006;Widory et al, 2004) and more studies in this region are needed. Source apportionment using 13 C was not very successful in Western Europe, because the main sources overlap (Martinsson et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%