2011
DOI: 10.1021/ie201968u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable Steam Reforming of Ethanol in a Two-Zone Fluidized-Bed Reactor

Abstract: The oxidative steam reforming of ethanol in a two-zone fluidized-bed reactor (TZFBR) and in a conventional fluidized-bed reactor over a Ni/Al 2 O 3 catalyst has been investigated. Catalyst deactivation has been studied for both contact modes. Coke generation has been verified by several techniques, and a stable performance was obtained in the TZFBR, where coke formation was counteracted with continuous catalyst regeneration. The effects of the main operating variables (steam/ethanol ratio S/E, oxygen/ethanol r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, two zones can be distinguished: the bottom zone, where the catalyst is only in contact with the regenerating agent, and the top zone, where the catalyst is in contact with the reactant gas. The corresponding concept—called Two-Zone Fluidized-Bed Reactor (TZFBR)—was applied for regeneration of an ethanol-reforming coked catalyst, (Pérez-Moreno et al, 2012) but also and mainly for decoupling the oxidation and reduction steps of catalyzed reactions following a Mars and Van Krevelen mechanism [i.e., styrene synthesis, (Cocco and Castor, 2001) oxidative dehydrogenation of butane and propane] (Soler et al, 1999; Gascón et al, 2005; Lobera et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, two zones can be distinguished: the bottom zone, where the catalyst is only in contact with the regenerating agent, and the top zone, where the catalyst is in contact with the reactant gas. The corresponding concept—called Two-Zone Fluidized-Bed Reactor (TZFBR)—was applied for regeneration of an ethanol-reforming coked catalyst, (Pérez-Moreno et al, 2012) but also and mainly for decoupling the oxidation and reduction steps of catalyzed reactions following a Mars and Van Krevelen mechanism [i.e., styrene synthesis, (Cocco and Castor, 2001) oxidative dehydrogenation of butane and propane] (Soler et al, 1999; Gascón et al, 2005; Lobera et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is obvious that the operation with high steam/ethanol ratios implies a high energy consumption to produce steam, and if water should be transported that would mean an additional expense. We have shown [18] that steam reforming of ethanol can be performed under operating conditions that would cause coke formation in a conventional reactor, by using a TZFBR. This application is quite similar to the methane steam reforming previously shown.…”
Section: Ethanol Steam Reformingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This expression, which has already been used in previous studies [24,31,35], weights bubble diameters proportionally to their size. The use of the weighted average d b is motivated by the fact that big bubbles are more representative of the bubbling gas flow than small spurious bubbles.…”
Section: Bubble Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the catalyst circulation, between the two zones allows the process integration [30]. The performance of this kind of reactor arrangement has been successfully tested in many processes such as: light alkane dehydrogenations, ethanol steam reforming or methane aromatization [31][32][33]. Its fluid dynamic characteristics have also been extensively studied both experimentally and with TFM simulations on pseudo-2D reactor geometries [24,[34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%