2013
DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnt123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stably Cayley Groups in Characteristic Zero

Abstract: A linear algebraic group G over a field k is called a Cayley group if it admits a Cayley map, i.e., a G-equivariant birational isomorphism over k between the group variety G and its Lie algebra. A Cayley map can be thought of as a partial algebraic analogue of the exponential map. A prototypical example is the classical "Cayley transform" for the special orthogonal group SOn defined by Arthur Cayley in 1846. A linear algebraic group G is called stably Cayley if G × G r m is Cayley for some r ≥ 0. Here G r m de… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If they are connected by a double edge and the root α k is longer than α i , then α i , α ∨ k = −1 [9, VI.1.3, possibility (5) ], and again vertex k gives a k to the sum. However, if the vertices i and k are connected by a double edge and the root α k is shorter than α i , then α i , α ∨ k = −2 ≡ 0 (mod 2) [9, VI.1.3, possibility (5) ], hence vertex k gives nothing to the sum in (7). We conclude that formula (7) can be written as (5).…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If they are connected by a double edge and the root α k is longer than α i , then α i , α ∨ k = −1 [9, VI.1.3, possibility (5) ], and again vertex k gives a k to the sum. However, if the vertices i and k are connected by a double edge and the root α k is shorter than α i , then α i , α ∨ k = −2 ≡ 0 (mod 2) [9, VI.1.3, possibility (5) ], hence vertex k gives nothing to the sum in (7). We conclude that formula (7) can be written as (5).…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Now we consider cases. If vertices i and k are connected by a single edge, then α i , α ∨ k = −1 [9, VI.1.3, possibility (3) ], hence vertex k gives a k to the sum in (7). If they are connected by a triple edge, then either α i , α ∨ k = −1 or α i , α ∨ k = −3 ≡ −1 (mod 2) [9, VI.1.3, possibility (7) ], and again vertex k gives a k to the sum.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that like the work of Poisson-Jacobi, Cayley's invention served as a tool in theoretical mechanics (this time the Lagrangian variant). Note also that the limits up to which the Cayley transform can be generalised have recently been established; see the paper by Nicole Lemire, Vladimir Popov and Zinovy Reichstein [58] where this problem was posed and settled in the case of algebraically closed ground field and the subsequent papers [12,13] for the treatment of the general case.…”
Section: Towards Infinitesimal Analoguesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For other stably Cayley K-groups, it is a difficult problem to determine whether they are Cayley or not. By [BKLR,Lemma 5.4(c)] the answer to the question whether a K-group is Cayley depends only on the equivalence class of G up to inner twisting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By [BKLR,Corollary 7.1] all the reductive K-groups of rank ≤ 2 over a field K of characteristic 0 are stably Cayley (by the rank we always mean the absolute rank). We would like to know, which of those stably Cayley K-groups of rank ≤ 2 are Cayley.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%