“…The magnitude of each MoV outlines the extent to which the morphological aspect it encodes is present in the set. Applications of bony surface SSMs in biomechanics and clinics have spanned anatomical and developmental studies (Li et al, 2010;Zhu and Li, 2011;Mutsvangwa et al, 2015;Baumbach et al, 2017;Wang and Shi, 2017;Zhang and Besier, 2017), shape anomaly staging (Van Haver et al, 2014;Agricola et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2016;Cerveri et al, 2018;Chan et al, 2018), joint osteoarthritis (Neogi et al, 2013;Van Dijck et al, 2018), surgical planning and intervention (Zheng and Schumann, 2009;Cerveri et al, 2017;Mauler et al, 2017;Youn et al, 2017), and morphology-function relations (Fitzpatrick et al, 2011;Rao et al, 2013;Baka et al, 2014;Peloquin et al, 2014;Smoger et al, 2015;Hollenbeck et al, 2018;Cerveri et al, 2019b;Clouthier et al, 2019). There have, however, been few studies attempting to extensively investigate the relationship between morphological features and the degree of deformity of the tibiofemoral joint affecting the mechanical stability of the knee.…”