2003
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8586.00175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stackelberg Mixed Duopoly with a Foreign Competitor

Abstract: We investigate Stackelberg mixed duopoly models where a stateowned public firm and a foreign private firm compete. We examine a desirable role (either leader or follower) of the public firm. We also consider endogenous roles by adopting the observable delay game of Hamilton and Slutsky (1990). We find that, in contrast to Pal (1998) discussing a case of domestic competitors, the public firm should be the leader and that it becomes the leader in the endogenous role game. We also find that in contrast to Ono (19… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
118
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
118
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These results complement those obtained by Matsumura [4] who demonstrate that if the demand function is concave the domestic public firm is strong and private firm is always weak.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results complement those obtained by Matsumura [4] who demonstrate that if the demand function is concave the domestic public firm is strong and private firm is always weak.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…They showed that in simultaneous-move games, privatization of the public firm may improve welfare. In the paper by Matsumura [4], the author investigates mixed duopoly and analyzes a desirable role (either leader or follower) of the public firm, when the inverse demand function ( ( ( ( ) ) ) ) G p p = = = = is concave. Under these conditions, Matsumura founds that the role of he public firm should be that of the leader.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We find that the public firm chooses to be a follower of all domestic private firms and that the public firm chooses not to be a leader of all foreign private firms, which is in contrast to Matsumura (2003). …”
contrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Pal (1998) analyses a domestic oligopoly with linear cost and demand functions; Matsumura (2003) focused on international mixed duopoly with convex costs and concave demand; Cornes and Sepahvand (2003) and Sepahvand (2004) consider international mixed duopolies with strictly log-concave demand and strictly convex cost functions. The aim of the present work is to generalize their analysis for the general case of a mixed duopoly (both domestic and international) limiting the assumptions to the mildest conditions needed to ensure existence of equilibria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%