2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00224-010-9269-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stackelberg Strategies and Collusion in Network Games with Splittable Flow

Abstract: We study the impact of collusion in network games with splittable flow and focus on the well established price of anarchy as a measure of this impact. We first investigate symmetric load balancing games and show that the price of anarchy is bounded from above by m, where m denotes the number of coalitions. For general networks, we present an instance showing that the price of anarchy is unbounded, even in the case of two coalitions. If latencies are restricted to polynomials, we prove upper bounds on the price… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A celebrated result of Roughgarden [25], and Roughgarden and Tardos [30] gives tight bounds on the PoA for nonatomic routing games for the social welfare objective. Recently, similar results were obtained for the PoA in atomic splittable routing games [13,29].…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A celebrated result of Roughgarden [25], and Roughgarden and Tardos [30] gives tight bounds on the PoA for nonatomic routing games for the social welfare objective. Recently, similar results were obtained for the PoA in atomic splittable routing games [13,29].…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Very recently, Bonifaci et al [2010] showed that for general graphs, no Stackelberg strategy can reduce the price of anarchy to a constant depending only on α, for any α ∈ [0, 1), thus resolving one of the main questions left open by our work and Roughgarden [2004]. Finally, we note that Fotakis [2010] and Harks [2011] obtained some PoA bounds for Stackelberg strategies in atomic unsplittable congestion games, and atomic splittable routing games, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Thus, in these settings, the PoA of the atomic splittable game is at most the PoA of the corresponding nonatomic game. Harks [2011] proved that the PoA with atomic splittable routing is at most m on a graph with m parallel links, and Bhaskar et al [2010] showed that this bound also holds for series-parallel graphs with m atomic players having the same source-sink pair. Awerbuch et al [2005] and Christodoulou and Koutsoupias [2005] provide PoA bounds for atomic, unsplittable routing games, and show that these can be worse than the PoA bounds in the nonatomic and atomic splittable setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For atomic splittable congestion games (cf. Bhaskar et al [5], Correa et al [14], Harks [24] and Schoppmann and Roughgarden [47]) it seems unclear whether or not similar results hold true.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%