1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1521-396x(199901)171:1<99::aid-pssa99>3.0.co;2-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stacking Fault Energies of Tetrahedrally Coordinated Crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature [52] only formation energies of stacking faults (SFs) are listed. Nevertheless, the low formation energy of the intrinsic stacking fault is consistent with experimental observations by Takeuchi et al [52], who estimated the formation energy based on the width of 60…”
Section: Stacking-fault Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature [52] only formation energies of stacking faults (SFs) are listed. Nevertheless, the low formation energy of the intrinsic stacking fault is consistent with experimental observations by Takeuchi et al [52], who estimated the formation energy based on the width of 60…”
Section: Stacking-fault Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value for G of 6.36 × 10 10 N/m 2 is used [17], which is the effective value for defects on {111} planes. The SF energy for the Si nc (γ Si nc ) is estimated to be 84 ± 9 mJ/m 2 , which is much higher than that for bulk Si reported in the literature [10,11,[14][15][16][17]. Therefore, we can deduce that the probability for the formation of SFs in Si nc is less than that in bulk Si.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Experimental observations indicated that the size of the stacking faults range from 30 to 50Å [11][12][13], and the value for the intrinsic stacking faults energy is calculated to be 55 ± 7 mJ/m 2 [10,11,14] or 69 mJ/m 2 [15,16]. However, the stacking fault energy for Si nc has not been determined yet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is interesting in itself as zinc blende is generally considered to be the stable phase of cadmium telluride [13]. Given the similarity in formation energy of the two phases however, the nearly equal preponderance should not come as a huge surprise [14]. Clearly, large sections of multiple grains would have to be inspected in order to obtain a statistical analysis of the tendency of one phase or the other to form within the cell.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%