1995
DOI: 10.1021/ja00149a006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stacking Free Energy Profiles for All 16 Natural Ribodinucleoside Monophosphates in Aqueous Solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
103
1
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
16
103
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We report a free-energy difference of ∼14 kcal/mol between the closed and open conformations. The quantities are comparable if we account for the fact that the loss of the interactions involving residue A24 upon loop opening can be associated with 2-6 kcal/mol (for 1-4 kcal/mol for the loss of each stacked base [Norberg and Nilsson 1995] plus base solvation costs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We report a free-energy difference of ∼14 kcal/mol between the closed and open conformations. The quantities are comparable if we account for the fact that the loss of the interactions involving residue A24 upon loop opening can be associated with 2-6 kcal/mol (for 1-4 kcal/mol for the loss of each stacked base [Norberg and Nilsson 1995] plus base solvation costs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These interactions are always conserved when the ligand is present, and the loss of extra stacking interactions in the absence of the ligand can explain the difference of 10 kcal/mol between the energy profile in Figures 3 and 5. An early MD study reports 1-4 kcal/mol (depending on nucleotide type) for each stacked base that is lost (Norberg and Nilsson 1995). Moreover, the consequent solvation of the A73, U74, and U75 bases has to be counted in the energetic cost that the system has to pay.…”
Section: Add A-riboswitch Aptamer Bound To the Cognate Ligandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A,G . C; Tables 2, 3) does not correspond to energetic values measured for base-stacking+ Turner and co-workers measured the free energy of base-stacking for 39-dangling ends and found that purines contributed 0+4-1+0 kcal/mol more than did pyrimidines (Freier et al+, 1986b)+ Calculations of base-stacking free energies for ribodinucleoside monophosphates also suggested a preference for the purine-purine interaction (Norberg & Nilsson, 1995)+ That these trends are not reflected in the data presented in this work suggests that the long-range displacements necessary for crosslinking of duplexes separated by a gap require overcoming an energetic barrier greater than the barrier to disrupt base-stacking+…”
Section: Comparison Of Data With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In ribodinucleoside monophosphates, the stacking preference follows the sequence purine-purine > purinepyrimidine pyrimidine-purine > pyrimidine-pyrimidine [124,125]. In particular, it was established that the stacked states have a 2-6 kcal mol lower free energy than the unstacked states for purine-purine dimers, while for pyrimidinepyrimidine dimers no appreciable barrier was obtained [124,126].…”
Section: The 3 5 Cgmp Polymerization Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it was established that the stacked states have a 2-6 kcal mol lower free energy than the unstacked states for purine-purine dimers, while for pyrimidinepyrimidine dimers no appreciable barrier was obtained [124,126]. The most favorable stacking is found in A-A and G-G [120,122,123], determining their rapidly-obtained stacked state in the high dielectric aqueous solution [127].…”
Section: The 3 5 Cgmp Polymerization Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%