2010
DOI: 10.1039/b919793a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stacking interaction between homostacks of simple aromatics and the factors influencing these interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The preference for the head-to-tail orientation in crystal structures is in good accordance with previous highly accurate quantumchemical calculations (Mishra & Sathyamurthy, 2005;Mishra et al, 2010). Recent studies have shown that the hydrogen-bonding capacity of the N atom is related to the strength of the stacking interaction between the rings (Mignon et al, 2004(Mignon et al, , 2005Ebrahimi et al, 2009;Choudhury & Chitra, 2010). Our previous results also indicate the large influence of hydrogen bonding, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The preference for the head-to-tail orientation in crystal structures is in good accordance with previous highly accurate quantumchemical calculations (Mishra & Sathyamurthy, 2005;Mishra et al, 2010). Recent studies have shown that the hydrogen-bonding capacity of the N atom is related to the strength of the stacking interaction between the rings (Mignon et al, 2004(Mignon et al, , 2005Ebrahimi et al, 2009;Choudhury & Chitra, 2010). Our previous results also indicate the large influence of hydrogen bonding, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Substitution of heteroatoms in Pyr and PY strengthens the π‐stacking interaction energy compared to Bz 2 and increases the likelihood that small aromatics will form stacks in bulk crystalline phases . The DFT(M06‐2X)/aug‐cc‐pVTZ interaction energies in various orientations of Pyr 2 (Figure A) agree with results reported by Hohenstein and Sherrill (Table ) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The interplanar separation of adjacent chelate rings is even somewhat shorter than the graphite spacing of 3.35 Å [67]. The centroid-centroid and Cu1ÁÁÁC8 distances found in 1 are among the shortest found in Cu(b-diketonato) 2 compounds and p-p interactions are consistent with well-defined p-p stacking interactions [68][69][70][71]. As classified by Janiak et al [72][73][74], interactions in nitrogen-containing heteroaromatic compounds are regarded as strong interactions, when rather short centroid-centroid contacts (CgÁÁÁCg \ 3.8 Å ), small slip angles (\25°) and small vertical displacements (\1.5 Å ) translate into a sizeable overlap of the aromatic planes.…”
Section: Crystal Aggregation Ofsupporting
confidence: 59%