1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1992.tb00195.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staff Nurse Identification of Nursing Diagnosis from a Written Case Study

Abstract: A descriptive study was conducted to determine how well medical-surgical and critical care staff nurses Identified the same nursing diagnoses and defining characteristics from a written case study. A convenience sample of 83 staff nurses from four acute careInstitutions participated In the study. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, regardless of educational background, age, or clinical experience, subjects failed to demonstrate recognition of many of the nursing problems identified by the expert panel. This supports findings of other researchers (Aspinall, 1976;Etheridge, Bos, & Bos, 1992;Spies, Myers, & Pinnel, 1989), suggesting that there still is a need to explore the teaching and evaluation of nursing diagnostic reasoning in both educational and practice settings. It also suggests that an alternate hypothesis be investigated as to whether poor performance on a clinical simulation exercise reflects an actual inability to recognize an existing problem, difficulty articulating the problem identified, or merely an inability to correctly label the diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Finally, regardless of educational background, age, or clinical experience, subjects failed to demonstrate recognition of many of the nursing problems identified by the expert panel. This supports findings of other researchers (Aspinall, 1976;Etheridge, Bos, & Bos, 1992;Spies, Myers, & Pinnel, 1989), suggesting that there still is a need to explore the teaching and evaluation of nursing diagnostic reasoning in both educational and practice settings. It also suggests that an alternate hypothesis be investigated as to whether poor performance on a clinical simulation exercise reflects an actual inability to recognize an existing problem, difficulty articulating the problem identified, or merely an inability to correctly label the diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, paper case materials do not provide sufficient patient information. They have limits in imaging of the subjects [2]. Consequently, learning to understand the patient comprehensively, including physical aspects, is necessary before undertaking clinical practice that addresses various cases.…”
Section: A Problems In Learning the Nursing Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirteen diagnoses from the NANDA Taxonomy I: Proposed ICD-CD 10 Version (Fitzpatrick et al, 1989) were used because clirucal data were available to verify their relevance to nursing care. For some of the nursing diagnoses, there was more than one clinical indicator.…”
Section: Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%