Staffing in hospital transfusion laboratories: UKTLC surveys show cause for concern

Abstract

Objectives:To monitor minimum standards in hospital transfusion laboratories in relation to qualifications, training, competency and the use of information technology over time against published recommendations. Background: The United Kingdom Transfusion LaboratoryCollaborative was formed in 2006 with representatives from relevant organisations and has published standards for transfusion laboratory practice. The standards are set to ensure safe transfusion laboratory practice. Regular surveys are performed to see the extent to which laboratories are able to meet these standards and where any problems lie.Methods: An electronic survey is sent to hospital transfusion laboratories on a single mid-week day in the spring and is repeated every 2 years from 2011, to be completed by the lead in transfusion for the day. The questions cover staffing, training, funding and workload.Results: Transfusion laboratories are having difficulty with staffing, particularly recruitment of suitably trained biomedical scientists, and with funding and time for training and education. Laboratory errors reported to the Serious Hazards of Transfusion haemovigilance scheme (SHOT) have not decreased with time, related to the under-resourced workforce.Conclusion: Problems in laboratory staffing and expertise in hospital transfusion laboratories need to be urgently addressed. The transfusion laboratory provides a key service to hospitals. The Blood Services in England and Wales are developing supportive strategies.

Blood product and laboratory resource wastage in non‐severe allergic transfusion reactions: an opportunity for improvement

“…A 2014 review estimated that 53% of transfusion service/blood bank labs reported being understaffed (Chaffe et al ., ). High turnover of lab technical staff and lack of specialty‐trained/‐qualified technicians are becoming increasingly identified as major challenges to maintaining laboratory quality and minimising lab testing errors (Bolton‐Maggs et al ., ; Novis et al ., ). As fewer technical staff are being expected to perform increasing volumes of testing, any and all efforts to reduce unnecessary testing volume can be expected to have a positive impact on lab quality, as well as workplace/job satisfaction among technical staff.…”

Human errors in manual techniques for ABO/D grouping are associated with potentially lethal outcomes

“…UKTLC standards have been considered by many laboratories during ongoing changes, especially in relation to staffing levels. However, staffing shortages have still not been addressed (Bolton‐Maggs et al, ). This, together with increased workload, contributes to lower morale and reduced job satisfaction, with many leaving for posts in other organisations or taking early retirement.…”

January 2020: What lies ahead?

“…Bolton-Maggs highlighted concerns around staffing in hospital transfusion laboratories. 7 Haemovigilance has steadily improved patient outcomes after transfusion, and Wood reviewed international efforts to encourage and establish these schemes across the world. 8 Specific risks, such as vasovagal reactions and haemolytic reactions from minor mismatched platelet transfusions, were highlighted by Thijsen 9 and Swain.…”

“…Ali Pourfathollah and co‐workers described the associations of particular HLA allotypes with priming of particular blood group‐specific alloantibodies. Turning to practical matters, Burns examined the cost of transfusion, which is crucial for the planning and costing of both current services and new interventions, and Bolton‐Maggs highlighted concerns around staffing in hospital transfusion laboratories …”