2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2018.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staffing Levels and Workload for Radiation Therapists in Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This included strategies documented elsewhere [ 9 , 47 ], such as embedding aspects of relational care into other tasks, for example, much of the discussion about wellbeing occurred while the nurse was preparing the patient to receive chemotherapy. These pressures, of course were observed to impact other professional groups working in the clinics too, and it is noted that there is considerable variability in staff patient ratios for outpatient cancer care [ 50 54 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This included strategies documented elsewhere [ 9 , 47 ], such as embedding aspects of relational care into other tasks, for example, much of the discussion about wellbeing occurred while the nurse was preparing the patient to receive chemotherapy. These pressures, of course were observed to impact other professional groups working in the clinics too, and it is noted that there is considerable variability in staff patient ratios for outpatient cancer care [ 50 54 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, workforce models cannot be solely based on population estimates or cancer incidence, historic levels of staffing or funding, or number of treatments delivered 18,19 and need to be reviewed frequently to keep up to date with treatment changes. 20 Models also need to factor in essential non-clinical activities carried out in radiation oncology services that are not directly linked to patient care. 19,21 Robust workforce models are needed for workforce planning to ensure sufficient investment is made in training, recruitment and retention efforts to meet future demand for services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key consideration for these models is how to account for new and more complex treatment techniques that disproportionately increase workload. For these reasons, workforce models cannot be solely based on population estimates or cancer incidence, historic levels of staffing or funding, or number of treatments delivered 18,19 and need to be reviewed frequently to keep up to date with treatment changes 20 . Models also need to factor in essential non‐clinical activities carried out in radiation oncology services that are not directly linked to patient care 19,21 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%