2015
DOI: 10.1239/aap/1435236983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staffing Many-Server Systems with Admission Control and Retrials

Abstract: We consider Markovian many-server systems with admission control operating in a Quality-and-Efficiency-Driven (QED) regime, where the relative utilization approaches unity while the number of servers grows large, providing natural Economies-of-Scale. In order to determine the optimal admission control policy, we adopt a revenue maximization framework, and suppose that the revenue rate attains a maximum when no customers are waiting and no servers are idling. When the revenue function scales properly with the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…so that the stationary distribution exists if and only if (2.5) holds. The case lim ρ↑1/Ps F s (ρ) < ∞ (as considered for example in [FA95,JvL12]) can also be considered in the present context, but leads to some complications that distract attention from the bottom line of the exposition.…”
Section: Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…so that the stationary distribution exists if and only if (2.5) holds. The case lim ρ↑1/Ps F s (ρ) < ∞ (as considered for example in [FA95,JvL12]) can also be considered in the present context, but leads to some complications that distract attention from the bottom line of the exposition.…”
Section: Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In §4, specifically Theorem 4.3, we show that (3.17) equals lim s→∞ D s (ρ), as expected, and we also derive the most relevant correction terms for finite s. Important here is that D s (ρ) converges to a value in the interval (0, 1) as s → ∞, which confirms that the local control in (3.5) leads to a nondegenerate limit. In [JvL12], s-independent control policies have been considered for which D s (ρ) has 1/ √ s-behavior for large s.…”
Section: Stochastic-process Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%