2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-012-0098-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stage and Discharge Forecasting by SVM and ANN Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Looped rating curve was successfully traced by SVM when the data set was divided into rising and falling stage data set. Aggarwal et al (2012) again employed SVM, ANN and persistence model for forecasting stage-discharge for Tikarapara site on Mahanadi for a period of 1-day, 7-day and 1-year. SVM provided the best forecast for stage as well as the discharge.…”
Section: Materials and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looped rating curve was successfully traced by SVM when the data set was divided into rising and falling stage data set. Aggarwal et al (2012) again employed SVM, ANN and persistence model for forecasting stage-discharge for Tikarapara site on Mahanadi for a period of 1-day, 7-day and 1-year. SVM provided the best forecast for stage as well as the discharge.…”
Section: Materials and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the functional relationship between stage and discharge is complex, time-varying, and cannot always captured by simple rating curve, even with the help of traditional modeling techniques such as polynomial regression or autoregressive integrated moving average ARIMA technique (Bhattacharya and Solomatine 2000). Many research attempts to establish this relation via data-driven techniques such as artificial neural networks ANNs (Tawfik et al 1997;Bhattacharya and Solomatine 2000;Sudheer and Jain 2003;Bisht et al 2010), decision trees (Bhattacharya and Solomatine 2003;Ghimire and Reddy 2010;Ajmera and Goyal 2012), support vector machine (Aggarwal et al 2012), wavelet-regression model (Kişi 2011), Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy inference system (Lohani et al 2006), and evolutionary-based data-driven models (Ghimire and Reddy 2010;Azamathulla et al 2011). The results approve that these techniques are very efficient and reliable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The appropriate combination of river stage and discharge of past time steps is used as inputs for modeling river flow in a time series perspective. The techniques such as artificial neural networks (ANNs), support vector machine (SVM), M5 model trees, fuzzy inference system /adaptive neuro-fuzzy infernece system (FIS/ANFIS) are used in popular tools for discharge predictions considering lagged stage and/or discharge values (Deka and Chandramouli 2003;Sudheer and Jain 2003;Sivapragasam and Muttil 2005;Bhattacharya and Solomatine 2005;Kisi and Cobaner 2009;Aggarwal et al 2012; Al-Abadi 2016, to name a few). Later on, the hybrid soft computing models based on wavelet transforms became popular for discharge prediction (Wei et al 2012;Tiwari and Chatterjee 2011;Shiri and Kisi 2010;Seghal et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%