1989
DOI: 10.1016/0090-8258(89)90894-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stage III ovarian tumors of low malignant potential (LMP) treated with cisplatin-combination therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For serous extra ovarian disease the prognosis is good (10,32) and collected data does not show evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival (33,34) . There are reports of surgical complete response (25) but also deaths as a complication of treatment (3,25,34) . Our data showed no significant decrease in recurrence or death for those who received adjuvant therapy, but recurrences were only seen in patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy and numbers were small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For serous extra ovarian disease the prognosis is good (10,32) and collected data does not show evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival (33,34) . There are reports of surgical complete response (25) but also deaths as a complication of treatment (3,25,34) . Our data showed no significant decrease in recurrence or death for those who received adjuvant therapy, but recurrences were only seen in patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy and numbers were small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As survival of Stage 1 disease is so high following surgery alone (99.3% in our series), no adjuvant therapy could realistically demonstrate a survival advantage. Even for Stage 3 disease little evidence exists that adjuvant chemotherapy is beneficial (1,5,12,15). In one study (I).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the lack of evidence that adjuvant Chemotherapy improves survival in patients with extra-ovarian spread. adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy continues to be offered in this context (2,7,15). However, of note, the National Institute of Health (NIH) published a consensus statement in 1995 that does not support a role for adjuvant chemotherapy in the management of LMP tumours ( 16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Although there was no difference in PFS or OS between the 2 arms, the investigators were able to define several prognostic variables for survival: residual disease (some vs. none), grade (1 vs. 2 or 3), age ( >30 y), and clear-cell carcinoma. Three additional publications include data from GOG 52 with the following results: there is no role for adjuvant chemotherapy for borderline tumors, 21 the benefit from the addition of doxorubicin to CP in *IP chemotherapy protocols are in Table 5. GOG protocols 182, 218, 262 include optimal and suboptimal patients.…”
Section: Optimal Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There was no difference in PFS or OS; however, patients on the C. parvum arm experienced more adverse events (Tables 4 and 5). 16 GOG 52 17,[21][22][23] Although cisplatin was being evaluated in suboptimal patients (GOG 47), GOG 52 assessed cisplatin's role in the ''optimally'' cytoreduced cohort. In the process, GOG 52 (1981 to 1985) defined a new GOG standard for optimal residual disease, r1 cm maximum diameter.…”
Section: Optimal Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%