Staged Deployment of Communications Satellite Constellations in Low Earth Orbit

Abstract

The "traditional" way of designing constellations of communications satellites in low Earth orbit is to optimize the design for a specified global capacity. This approach is based on a forecast of the expected number of users and their activity level, both of which are highly uncertain. This can lead to economic failure if the actual demand is significantly smaller than the one predicted. This paper presents an alternative flexible approach. The idea is to deploy the constellation progressively, starting with a smaller, more affordable capacity that can be increased in stages as necessary by launching additional satellites and reconfiguring the existing constellation in orbit. It is shown how to find the best reconfigurable constellations within a given design space. The approach, in effect, provides system designers and managers with real options that enable them to match the system evolution path to the actual unfolding demand scenario. A case study demonstrates significant economic benefits of the proposed approach, when applied to Low Earth Orbit (LEO) constellations of communications satellites. In the process, life cycle cost and capacity are traded against each other for a given fixed per-channel performance requirement. The benefits of the staged approach demonstrably increase, with greater levels of demand uncertainty. A generalized framework is proposed for large capacity systems facing high demand uncertainty.

Case Studies of Historical Epoch Shifts: Impacts on Space Systems and their Responses

“…The story of Globalstar is similar to that of Iridium 12 . Funded primarily by Qualcomm Inc. and Loral Space & Communications, Globalstar was designed to provide global space-based communications including voice, data, fax, paging, and positioning 13 .…”

“…Despite these efforts however, the company was not able to gain enough subscribers to cover the still high costs of system development. In the end, Globalstar suffered the same outcomes as Iridium 12 , an initial business failure, followed by a bankruptcy-permitted rebirth and restructuring. In Fig.…”

An Approach for Integrating Valuable Flexibility During Conceptual Design of Networks

“…The evaluation helps to determine the cost of implementing real options for the desired flexibility and to decide the appropriate time to exercise the real options. In literature, different kinds of methods are proposed to evaluate real options (de Weck et al 2004) applied binomial tree approach to obtain the value of real options in stage deployment of communication satellites (Babajide et al 2009) used decision tree method to evaluate the value of flexibility in oil deployment projects. The binomial approach has limitations in that it assumes path-independency which does not hold in engineering systems and decision tree analysis suffers from intractable computations as the number of decision-making periods and states increases.…”

Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration for Survivability

“…9,10 As temporal system properties that reflect the degree to which systems are able to maintain or even improve function in the presence of change, the "-ilities" (e.g., flexibility) constitute a rich area of research for improving value delivery over the lifecycle of systems. 11 Applicable across engineering domains, the "-ilities" are particularly critical to space systems which are characterized by high cost, long design lives, high complexity, interdependencies with other systems, and dynamic operational contexts.…”