1977
DOI: 10.1177/105960117700200404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited

Abstract: The purpose of this review was to examine published research on small-group development done in the last ten years that would constitute an empirical test of Tuckman's (1965) hypothesis that groups go through the stages of "forming," "storming," "norming," and "performing." Of the twenty-two studies reviewed, only one set out to directly test this hypothesis, although many of the others could be related to it. Following a review of these studies, a fifth stage, "adjourning," was added to the hypothesis, and mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
1,189
4
48

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,905 publications
(1,268 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
27
1,189
4
48
Order By: Relevance
“…They do not have access to non-verbal communication cues and they rarely engage in discussion concurrently. The implications of this altered sense of co-presence for the collaborative process can be 3.1 Group work as a source of conflict Research that focuses on the interactions that take place within groups has a long history involving studies with face-to-face groups in the workplace and in voluntary settings such as support groups ( Tuckman, 1965;Tuckman & Jensen, 1977). Conflict has been identified as a characteristic component of group work.…”
Section: Social Cognitive Neuroscience and The Embodied Manifestationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They do not have access to non-verbal communication cues and they rarely engage in discussion concurrently. The implications of this altered sense of co-presence for the collaborative process can be 3.1 Group work as a source of conflict Research that focuses on the interactions that take place within groups has a long history involving studies with face-to-face groups in the workplace and in voluntary settings such as support groups ( Tuckman, 1965;Tuckman & Jensen, 1977). Conflict has been identified as a characteristic component of group work.…”
Section: Social Cognitive Neuroscience and The Embodied Manifestationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research that focuses on the interactions that take place within groups has a long history involving studies with face-to-face groups in the workplace and in voluntary settings such as support groups ( Tuckman, 1965;Tuckman & Jensen, 1977). Conflict has been identified as a characteristic component of group work.…”
Section: Group Work As a Source Of Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was informed by the literature using the main theories in group dynamics [22], group cohesion and development [23], social identity theory [24], group conflict theory [25], change management [26], occupational psychology [27] and prosocial behaviour [28]. Various situations were also investigated where ad-hoc implementations of DM could create negative effect amongst the social actors within the workplace which resulted in six scenarios according to the main theories in conflict resolution.…”
Section: Methods and Research Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, team tenure and the stage of team development may influence third culture formation. In general, teams go through five stages of development: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning (Tuckman & Jensen, 1977 Note: ** denotes correlation is significant at p < .01 * denotes correlation is significant at p < .05…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%