2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.69.034503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staggered versus overlap fermions: A study in the Schwinger model withNf=0,1,2

Abstract: We study the scalar condensate and the topological susceptibility for a continuous range of quark masses in the Schwinger model with N f = 0, 1, 2 dynamical flavors, using both the overlap and the staggered discretization. At finite lattice spacing the differences between the two formulations become rather dramatic near the chiral limit, but they get severely reduced, at the coupling considered, after a few smearing steps.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
83
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
8
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the vanishing of the condensate in one-flavor QCD). This point has been discussed in our earlier paper [18] and elsewhere [2,3,19,23,30,32]. We assume throughout this paper that the order of limits has been taken correctly, so that the RCT has positive quark mass, which may only be taken to zero as a final step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…the vanishing of the condensate in one-flavor QCD). This point has been discussed in our earlier paper [18] and elsewhere [2,3,19,23,30,32]. We assume throughout this paper that the order of limits has been taken correctly, so that the RCT has positive quark mass, which may only be taken to zero as a final step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the continuum, the determinant of D + m is then (formally) positive; the determinant is rigorously positive for overlap quarks. 3 We thus have…”
Section: Rooted Correlation Functions In the Continuum Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We compare (rooted) staggered to overlap fermions [4], both actions defined with one step of APE smearing. For details see [5,6]. Throughout, we use the coupling e to define the physical scale and set the lattice spacing to a = 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%