2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stair-specific algorithms for identification of touch-down and foot-off when descending or ascending a non-instrumented staircase

Abstract: Research HighlightsAlgorithms defining touch-down and foot-off (TD/FO) in stair ambulation are presented Performance of these algorithms was determined by comparison to force defined events TD/ FO were determined with acceptable precision in young and old adultsThe algorithms performed equally well at differing riser heights (85-255 mm)These algorithms can be used when force-instrumented staircases are unavailable AbstractThe present study introduces four event detection algorithms for defining touch-down and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports based on aspects of this data are currently available in the literature [1,22,2,8,9]. This is the first study on the differences in CoM control and contribution of specific lower limb joints between young and older adults when descending stairs with increased versus standard stair riser-heights, using a step-over-step strategy, and focusing on two distinct phases of stance (landing and lowering).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Previous reports based on aspects of this data are currently available in the literature [1,22,2,8,9]. This is the first study on the differences in CoM control and contribution of specific lower limb joints between young and older adults when descending stairs with increased versus standard stair riser-heights, using a step-over-step strategy, and focusing on two distinct phases of stance (landing and lowering).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…2). We cannot distinguish if the speed increase was mainly in the stance or swing phase of stairs negotiation as we did not record the foot-off events [30]. One can assume that patients lowered their body faster during the stance phase because the subjects increased their joint angular speed at the knee in the sagittal plane and at the hip in the frontal plane when descending stairs [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A cycle lasts from the time point a foot touches the ground until the next contact of the same foot. A combination of vertical shank acceleration and hip and knee angular movement were used to detect those events [29,30].…”
Section: Objective Functional Assessment Of Locomotionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing stair ascent and descent marker-based event detection algorithms were used to determine instants of foot-contact and foot-off in each trial. 18 Trials were completed using a 'step-over-step gait', thus the 'leading limb' on each staircase step alternated between left and right limbs. As transitions from stair to floor have been shown to involve slightly different limb kinematics, 16 heel clearance for the bottom step in descent was not assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marker trajectories were labelled in Vicon Nexus (http://www.vicon.com/software/nexus) and the resultant C3D files uploaded to Visual 3D (http://www.c-motion.com/products/visual3d/) for further analysis. Existing stair ascent and descent marker‐based event detection algorithms were used to determine instants of foot‐contact and foot‐off in each trial . Trials were completed using a ‘step‐over‐step gait’, thus the ‘leading limb’ on each staircase step alternated between left and right limbs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%