Stakeholder complexity in large scale green building projects

Abstract

Purpose In response to the world’s rising awareness on sustainability, industry players and policymakers are devoting great efforts to bolster green building developments. Every green building project (GBP) involves numerous stakeholders and potentially incompatible concerns. Despite the associated environmental, economic and social benefits, GBP developments have often confronted managerial barriers which are actually emerged from stakeholders – the actual key determinants of a project. Holistically analyzing the complexity of stakeholders in GBPs is, therefore, crucial to improving GBP management and achieving greater sustainability for all involved. The purpose of this paper is to analyze stakeholder complexity in large GBPs using a holistic framework which integrates both empirical and rationalistic analytical perspectives. Design/methodology/approach The complexity of stakeholders in GBPs can be considered from three aspects – identifying stakeholders, assessing stakeholder interactions and analyzing stakeholder concerns. The proposed stakeholder analysis framework uses both empirical methods (e.g. interviews and surveys) and rationalistic methods (e.g. chain referral sampling and social network analysis) to analyze GBP stakeholder complexity. Case study of a lab-enabled commercial GBP in Hong Kong was undertaken to illustrate the framework. Findings The framework enables a holistic, objective and effective stakeholder analysis; leading GBP leaders toward a complete understanding of project stakeholder complexity. The case study findings bring managerial insights to GBP leaders on the general SNA-related stakeholder dynamics and the important stakeholder concerns, of large Hong Kong GBPs. The findings diagnose general connectivity structures of GBP stakeholders, identify influential and peripheral actors in GBP information exchange, and suggest clues to improve their dynamics. In addition, ten key stakeholder concerns were identified, including comprehensive governmental standards and procedures, clear sustainability goals at the outset, effective stakeholder engagement, adequate design flexibility, and a “can-do” attitude of contractors and consultants – which are all vital for successful GBP development. The underlying reasons of these concerns and recommendations to addressing them were also discussed. Originality/value Many existing GBP stakeholder studies appear to use a single analytical perspective to assess project stakeholder complexity, but this may not gain a full understanding. The holistic stakeholder analysis framework used herein combines empiricism and rationalism. It helps to bring GBP leaders and implementers toward a more informed project decision making, a more thorough understanding of stakeholder complexity, as well as a more effective engagement of stakeholders.

Decisions by Key Office Building Stakeholders to Build or Retrofit Green in Toronto’s Urban Core

“…Their findings indicate that rent premiums and higher prices are generated in LEED certified properties. Additionally, green properties are absorbed by the market in less than half the time when compared to those without green certification [14]. The 2019 study that looked at the city of Hong Kong (7.5 m) by Wadu Mesthrige and Chan [15] found that developer and investor stakeholders were uncertain and sceptical about the financial rewards of green certification.…”

“…Traditionally one of the major considerations is market valuation, expressed as the asking rent of office space per square foot. This study uses an approach used by similar studies that were conducted in Milan [14] and Hong Kong [16]. These studies use a hedonic model in the form of an ordinary least squares (OLS) linear regression model based on a fixed effects approach to the attributes of commercial office property on rental price.…”

Towards Complexity and Dynamics: A Bibliometric-Qualitative Review of Network Research in Construction

“…e relationally defined method was more frequently adopted in Category III (11.90%). Two sampling methods, including snowball sampling [56,118,125] and chain-referral sampling [121,123], were used in these studies. Compared with Category III, the methodologically defined method was more frequently used in Categories I, II, and IV (27.03%, 31.25%, and 92.31%, resp.).…”

Best Fit for Common Purpose: A Multi-Stakeholder Design Optimization Methodology for Construction Management

“…The global challenges caused by global warming, rapid urbanization, economic instability, and the ever-reducing affordability of housing call for rethinking and improvement of the ways we design and construct new buildings and renovate the existing ones. Aiming to answer this call, the research agenda of "better buildings" has been expanding rapidly over the last several decades, resulting in the development of multiple research domains and themes such as green buildings [1][2][3][4], low-and zero-carbon buildings [5][6][7][8], passive buildings [9,10], sustainable buildings [11,12], circular buildings [13,14], resilient buildings [15,16], smart buildings [17,18], and healthy buildings [19,20]. Some of the themes have made their way to statutes, building codes, standards, and certification schemes and certain ideas have been adopted by practitioners but there is still a very long way to go if we want to meet present and future challenges.…”

“…The project development and design processes in the construction industry are still often disconnected and based on individualistic principles where each involved party seeks to maximize their own local gains and optimize their own part of the project development chain, which can result in suboptimal performance on the project level [21,22]. With the increasing complexity of the projects and a greater number of internal and external stakeholders and perspectives involved, it will become harder to come to a consensus and that, as a consequence, could result in conflicts, project delays, and expanding project costs [4,[23][24][25][26]. Moving forward, the process will need to become more integrated, streamlined, and actively involve multiple stakeholders at all the stages of project development, starting from the earliest ones [21,25,27,28].…”