2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-29133-3_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stakeholder-Driven Collaborative Modeling of Subject-Oriented Business Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comprehand is generally used by individuals for reflection and articulation purposes, although it can be applied in multi-user settings as well (Furtmüller and Oppl 2007;Wachholder and Oppl 2012;Oppl 2013).…”
Section: Collaborative Model Articulation and Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comprehand is generally used by individuals for reflection and articulation purposes, although it can be applied in multi-user settings as well (Furtmüller and Oppl 2007;Wachholder and Oppl 2012;Oppl 2013).…”
Section: Collaborative Model Articulation and Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehand Tables in addition can be linked with each other to allow for spatially (Oppl 2011) or conceptually distributed collaborative modeling (Oppl and Rothschädl 2014;Wachholder and Oppl 2012).…”
Section: Collaborative Model Articulation and Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virtual enactment as specified here draws from the concept of facilitated model-walkthroughs [14], which are usually carried out in a co-located group setting, bringing together all involved stakeholders at the same place and the same time to collaboratively go through the process. A distributed form of model-walkthroughs can be imagined (and actually has been considered in our own earlier work [41,42]) but is not subject of the present approach due to the inevitable loss of communication and negotiation potential that would need to be compensated for by further groupware instruments. This in turn could interfere with the core aim of the present work, namely to examine the feasibility of virtual enactment as such, and act as a confounding variable in our studies.…”
Section: Conceptual Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%