Stakeholder Dynamics in Land Development Projects

Bradshaw, Karen

doi:10.1086/705921

The Journal of Legal Studies

2021

DOI: 10.1086/705921

|View full text |Cite

Stakeholder Dynamics in Land Development Projects

Karen Bradshaw¹

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Bradshaw (2021) describes how land development projects are a source of endless controversy, where groups interact to block, approve or stall projects. Indeed, she outlines how public stakeholders can impose increasing costs on developers, pushing otherwise profitable projects into negative expected values.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Chilling Effects from Anti-SLAPP Laws

Schaufele

2022

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Chilling Effects from Anti-SLAPP Laws

Schaufele

2022

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPP), democratic status and efficiency of the judiciary: Comparative statistical analysis

Mojašević

2024

Zb Pravnog fak Niš

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation (SLAPP lawsuits) are a legal tool for intimidating and silencing critical awareness. While their application was first and foremost recorded in the United States, over the last decade, they have generated significant attention of the professional and general public in Europe due to their constant growth. In 2024, this has led to the adoption of the anti-SLAPP Directive by the European Parliament. This paper examines the relationship between the increase in strategic lawsuits in selected European countries and their democratic status, examined on the basis of two indicators: media freedom and judicial independence. The author further investigates the relationship between the trend in the number of strategic lawsuits and judicial efficiency. The aim is to determine whether strategic lawsuits are characteristic of the countries with low democratic status (not-free or partly free countries), a low degree of media freedom and judicial independence, as well as the countries with inefficient courts and judicial procedures. To this effect, the author has conducted a statistical analysis, which indicates that strategic lawsuits are present in all countries, regardless of the level of development of democratic institutions, the state of media freedom, judicial independence, and the efficiency of the judiciary. Based on this finding, the author concludes by raising some questions which are to be addressed in further research into the social, political, and legal phenomenon of SLAPP lawsuits.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Stakeholder Dynamics in Land Development Projects

Cited by 2 publications

References 6 publications

Chilling Effects from Anti-SLAPP Laws

Chilling Effects from Anti-SLAPP Laws

Strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPP), democratic status and efficiency of the judiciary: Comparative statistical analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About