2016
DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n2s1p188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stakeholder Engagement in Community-based Malaria Studies in a Defined Setting in the Eastern Province, Rwanda

Abstract: The value of engaging stakeholders for locally relevant responses and sustainable gains in disease control programs has been increasingly acknowledged. As opposed to a traditional top-down implementation of malaria intervention strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discussions suggested potential areas of contribution including promotion of malaria preventive measures and participation in the MEPR planning, implementation and knowledge translation activities [22]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Discussions suggested potential areas of contribution including promotion of malaria preventive measures and participation in the MEPR planning, implementation and knowledge translation activities [22]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high increase from 61.3 to 91% in CBHI membership when compared to the 2013 baseline survey was also reported. Additionally, prompt and adequate care among households with presumed malaria cases (estimated at 21% compared to 68% reported in 2013) was determined by high self-efficacy, recognition of malaria symptoms and ownership of a CBHI [22, 28]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A previous stakeholder analysis by the project team identified four rice farmers’ cooperatives with 1914 members from which a cluster random sample of rice farmers for the socio-economic baseline survey was drawn, and conducted in January 2015 [ 26 ]. With a confidence level of 95% and a risk of error of 5%, a minimum sample size of 320 rice farmers from the four cooperatives and representing the marshlands in which the three intervention arms were to be experimented (control, community-based and project supervised) was calculated for statistical analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%