Stakeholder Network Analysis for Front-of-Pack Labeling in China

Abstract

BackgroundFront-of-pack (FoP) labeling on packaged foods is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) to reduce diet-related non-communicable diseases, but it has not yet been implemented in China. The introduction of FoP labeling is driven by multiple institutions and stakeholders. This study aimed to identify key institutional actors involved in FoP labeling and describe links between actors to support future FoP labeling policies and programmes in China.MethodsThe Net-Map method was adopted. We conducted Net-map activities with eight participants using face-to-face interviews between November 2020 and May 2021. Participants were asked to identify actors involved in the development and implementation of FoP labeling in China, describe networks among actors according to pre-defined link types (command, dissemination, funding, and technical assistance), and estimate influence of each actor within the FoP labeling landscape. Social network analysis measures of cohesion and centrality were used to describe each network. Gephi software was used for social network analysis and network visualization.ResultsForty-one unique actors were identified across seven actor categories including government agencies (n = 14), technical support agencies (n = 7), professional associations (n = 10), food industry groups (n = 2), media groups (n = 4), international organizations (n = 3), and a consumer group (n = 1). Weighted influence scores among actors ranged from 0.13 to 3.13. The Department of Food Safety Standards, Risk Surveillance and Assessment of the National Health Commission (DFSSRSA of NHC) was the actor with the highest weighted influence score, followed by the Bureau of Disease Prevention and Control of National Health Commission, Chinese Nutrition Society, and the National Institute for Nutrition and Health of Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. DFSSRSA of NHC played a central role in both command and technical assistance networks. State-owned media had the greatest betweenness and outdegree centrality in the dissemination network. The Chinese Nutrition Society was in the central position and provided funding to diverse actors in the funding network.ConclusionsA variety of multisectoral actors have an interest in the introduction of FoP labeling policies and programmes. Effectively engaging key actors identified in this study can generate a multisectoral commitment to advance FoP labeling policies and programmes in China.

Evaluation of the Nutritional Quality of Chinese Processed Meat Products: Comparison of Two Nutrient Profile Models

“…The Chilean FOPWL and the Chinese Healthier Choice Logo were used to cross-compare the nutrient content of processed meat products in China, the UK, and France. China Consumer Surveys on FOPL [ 30 , 31 , 32 ] and other studies on the view of stakeholders on the FOPL policy in the Chinese context [ 33 , 34 ] indicated that Chinese residents and stakeholders tended to prefer interpretive FOPL. Furthermore, due to the limitations of mandated labeling contents of Chinese food labeling standards, summary-based graded NP models that evaluate overall nutritional quality of foods, such as Nutri-Score, cannot be used in this study to evaluate the nutrient content of products.…”

Chinese Consumers’ Trust in Food Safety Surveillance Sampling of Commonly Consumed Foods

“…Consumers of commonly consumed foods are particularly concerned. To this end, the states have developed and introduced a series of food standards to ensure consumer safety [4][5][6]. By 2020, a food safety supervision system based on risk analysis and supply chain management has been established, and major regional and systemic food safety risks have been controlled.…”