2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stakeholder participation practices and onshore CCS: Lessons from the dutch CCS case barendrecht

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
70
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, societal acceptance is at least as an important constraint (Johnsson et al 2009). Local communities have successfully opposed CCS projects, based on (perceived) risks (Brunsting et al 2011).…”
Section: Availability Of Ccs Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, societal acceptance is at least as an important constraint (Johnsson et al 2009). Local communities have successfully opposed CCS projects, based on (perceived) risks (Brunsting et al 2011).…”
Section: Availability Of Ccs Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Safety and efficacy concerns inherent to the carbon dioxide capture, transportation, and storage processes worry the public and their representatives, introducing the potential for siting and business development inefficiencies that could prevent the technology from taking root in the marketplace or reaching its full potential as a greenhouse gas mitigation strategy. Social acceptance is thus a dual challenge: not only might lack of acceptance prevent facility and storage siting for a mature CCS technologies, but it has already revealed its potential for scuttling pilot projects such as Barendrecht (Brunsting, et al, 2011) [1], threatening to prevent CCS from germinating in the marketplace at all.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we analyze five case studies of CO 2 storage projects in the light of the reviewed literature and discuss alternative explanations for the successes and failures of the CO 2 storage siting proposals. Full underpinning reports of our case studies [19,20,21] and complementary papers [22,23] are also available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%