Stakeholder preferences for best management practices for non-point source pollution and stormwater control

System interactions of stormwater management using sustainable urban drainage systems and green infrastructure

“…The participatory process of community stream restoration projects also cause delays and potential oppositions for implementation, in contrast to the fast, standard and topdown implementation of conventional solutions (Winz et al, 2011). In the USA, stakeholders such as house owners have shown a willingness to use non-structural measures such as streambank naturalisation and wetlands to reduce stormwater and non-point source pollution (Kaplowitz & Lupi, 2012). Furthermore, such community projects on stream restoration create positive effects on vegetation and raise people's awareness, probably due to communal ownership of the project (Winz et al, 2011).…”

Research on Rural Nonpoint Source Pollution in the Process of Urban-Rural Integration in the Economically-Developed Area in China Based on the Improved STIRPAT Model

“…They also discussed the implementation difficulties and corresponding countermeasures. Kaplowitz et al studied non-point source pollution control using the selected experimental investigation methods and by understanding the publicʼs preferences [11]. The results show that the involvement of stakeholders can increase the public recognition of the pollution control plan, thereby improving the effectiveness of pollution control.…”

A Mapping of Tools for Informing Water Sensitive Urban Design Planning Decisions—Questions, Aspects and Context Sensitivity

“…The "How Much" category is further divided into tools that quantify different types of impacts: impacts related to hydraulics, i.e., the flow of water through pipes and across surfaces, impacts related to hydrology, i.e., the flow of water through the entire urban water cycle including groundwater and the atmosphere, impacts related to water quality, i.e., the pollution carried with water, impacts that are not directly linked to the flow of water (such as aesthetics and recreation), and economic impacts. Carbon footprint [29] Stakeholder preferences [30] Thorough ecosystem [31] Rapid ecosystem [32] X Flext (DayWater) [33] SWMPT [34] X BMP MCA [35] BMP DSM [36] Project choice [37] MCA/cost [38] X X SWITCH BMP DSS [39] SUDS potential [40] X X X X X SUSTAIN [41] UHRU [42] X X X LIDRA [43] STEPL [44] X X X X X MCA&CBA [45] X X X X Flood Risk CBA [46] X X X SUDSLOC [47] When going through our search results we focused more on water quantity issues than water quality, and hence tools that focus on water quality were omitted. For examples of tools with specific focus on water quality issues, see e.g., [12][13][14].…”

“…Kaplowitz and Lupi [30] used choice experiment surveys to answer the question "what is the best BMP in terms of amenity value, as seen by the target group of such value". Their findings show that homeowners cared about the types and combinations of BMPs suggested for improving river water quality in their watershed, and unambiguously preferred management plans with high levels of stream bank naturalization and some wetlands.…”

“…The exceptions are the tool that simply displays GIS-data [34] and the tool that reveals stakeholders' preferences [30] (assumed that these preferences are not affected by the options' hydraulic performance since the stakeholders were not informed of these). Table 3.…”