2014
DOI: 10.1002/csr.1356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stakeholder Prioritization, Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Company Performance: Further Evidence

Abstract: Using KLD data on more than 900 company's performance over a nine year period in seven areas of corporate social responsibility (environment, community, corporate governance, diversity, employee relations, human rights, and product quality), this research note re-tests Michelon et al. (2013) proxies for prioritization and strategic approaches to CSR. The results show that, when a company pursues CSR initiatives that are linked to stakeholder preferences and allocates resources to these initiatives in a strateg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
56
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research could complement our study by controlling for the quality of stakeholder engagement with respect to stakeholder prioritization (Michelon et al, 2013;Boesso et al, 2015), by examining the importance of stakeholder engagement in assessing the impact of CSR performance and disclosure on financial markets, by investigating if its value relevance depends on alternative institutional characteristics other than culture. First, we do not control for the quality of stakeholder engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research could complement our study by controlling for the quality of stakeholder engagement with respect to stakeholder prioritization (Michelon et al, 2013;Boesso et al, 2015), by examining the importance of stakeholder engagement in assessing the impact of CSR performance and disclosure on financial markets, by investigating if its value relevance depends on alternative institutional characteristics other than culture. First, we do not control for the quality of stakeholder engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, firms that fail to address stakeholders' needs could face negative consequences such as a lack of support from employees or loss of customers (Wood, ; M. D. P. Lee, ). However, when a firm adopts CSR initiatives that are linked to stakeholder preferences and allocates resources to these initiatives in a strategic way, the positive effect of its CSR initiatives on performance strengthens in terms of both market‐based (Boesso et al, ) and accounting‐based measures of performance (Boesso, Favotto, & Michelon, ; Michelon, Boesso, & Kumar, ). The main conclusion of these studies is that firms need to link their CSR initiatives to the likely preferences of their stakeholders and undertake corporate social actions that are relevant to the firm's strategy (Boesso et al, ; Michelon et al, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Stakeholder Approach To Csrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, social activists have found a new voice. While the dialogue with stakeholders has become an essential strategy to ensure the financial stability of companies (Ruf et al , ; Alniacik et al , ; Vasi and King, ; Michelon et al , ; Boesso et al , ), the use of SMe also enhances the complexity of managing corporate reputation and identity (Bebbington et al , ; Heikkurinen and Ketola, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%