Stakeholder Theory 2005
DOI: 10.1057/9780230524224_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stakeholder Theory and Normative Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This perceived responsibility manifests itself in actions designed to enhance the corporation's relationship with those stakeholders (Orlitzky and Swanson, 2008;Kletz, 2005). Also referred to as Corporate Social Performance (CSP).…”
Section: Social Performance (Sp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This perceived responsibility manifests itself in actions designed to enhance the corporation's relationship with those stakeholders (Orlitzky and Swanson, 2008;Kletz, 2005). Also referred to as Corporate Social Performance (CSP).…”
Section: Social Performance (Sp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a certain minimum amount of SRI investing would be needed to influence capital rationing among firms (Heinkel et al, 2001;Sauer, 1997). A complementary approach would be for legislative or regulatory bodies to act in concert to require social performance reporting as external stakeholders (Freeman, 1984;Kletz, 2005). The reputational effect on companies of SRI funds acting in concert has the potential to affect corporate FP (Heinkel et al, 2001).…”
Section: Institutionalmentioning
confidence: 99%