1987
DOI: 10.1177/154193128703100321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STALL: A Simple Model for Workload Analysis in Early System Development

Abstract: The Saturation of Tactical Aviator Load Limits (STALL) is defined as the intersection of asymptotically high and low load limits. In a closed queuing system consisting of M homogeneous demand generators, it has been shown that response time becomes asymptotically linear as M increases. This provides a quantitative basis for specifying the saturation point if one knows both arrival rate and service rate (the inverse of task duration). Early in system development, one can typically estimate arrival rates based … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristics of task selection on the basis of expected utilities and costs also lie at the core of the concurrent performance assumptions made by many of the predictive models of complex task performance (Pew, Baron, Feehrer, and Miller, 1977), such as the human operator simulator (HOS) (Harris, Iavecchia, Ross, and Shaffer, 1987;Strieb, Lane, Glenn, and Wherry, 1981;Wherry, 1976), SAINT' (Laughery, Drews, and Archer, 1986;Wortman, Duket, Seifert, Hann, and Chubb, 1978;), PROCRU (Zacharias, Baron, and Muralidharan,1981), STALL (saturation of tactical aviator load limits; Chubb, Stodolsky, Fleming, and Hassoun, 1987), and those models developed by Siegel and Wolf (1969), , Chu and Rouse (1979), and Tulga and Sheridan (1980). Essentially these models assume that when two (or more) tasks compete for attention (call for completion at the same time), an algorithm assesses the order in which the tasks are to be performed.…”
Section: Task Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of task selection on the basis of expected utilities and costs also lie at the core of the concurrent performance assumptions made by many of the predictive models of complex task performance (Pew, Baron, Feehrer, and Miller, 1977), such as the human operator simulator (HOS) (Harris, Iavecchia, Ross, and Shaffer, 1987;Strieb, Lane, Glenn, and Wherry, 1981;Wherry, 1976), SAINT' (Laughery, Drews, and Archer, 1986;Wortman, Duket, Seifert, Hann, and Chubb, 1978;), PROCRU (Zacharias, Baron, and Muralidharan,1981), STALL (saturation of tactical aviator load limits; Chubb, Stodolsky, Fleming, and Hassoun, 1987), and those models developed by Siegel and Wolf (1969), , Chu and Rouse (1979), and Tulga and Sheridan (1980). Essentially these models assume that when two (or more) tasks compete for attention (call for completion at the same time), an algorithm assesses the order in which the tasks are to be performed.…”
Section: Task Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%