46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2008
DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stall Behaviour of the EUROLIFT High Lift Configurations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An increase of the slat cutout further weakens the flow in this area thereby limiting the maximum lift capability of the wing. Passive devices like strakes are a standard measure to counteract the separation [4,5] but are limited in effectiveness with increased slat cutout and nacelle size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase of the slat cutout further weakens the flow in this area thereby limiting the maximum lift capability of the wing. Passive devices like strakes are a standard measure to counteract the separation [4,5] but are limited in effectiveness with increased slat cutout and nacelle size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wind tunnel tests were carried out on the DLR-F11 high lift configuration for low-Reynolds number conditions in the atmospheric wind tunnel of Airbus in Bremen. On the other side, investigations of the stall characteristics on this configuration revealed significant Reynolds number effects 49 . There is at present no evidence, to what extent the sensitive formation of the strake vortex, its spatial development and interference with the fixed wing boundary layer is affected by Reynolds number scaling effects.…”
Section:  Aerial Velocity Measurements Based On Pivmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…To deal with the local flow separation described above, a passive flow control solution in the form of a strake was positioned on the nacelle [6,10]. However, this solution is insufficiently effective [6].…”
Section: Figure 1 Cfd Simulation Of Wing-nacelle Junction Showing Flmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The close coupling of the nacelle, wing and slat complicates the flow and creates structures that significantly alter the direction and near-wall momentum of the flow, leading to local separations, reduced lift and increased drag [3][4][5]. As part of several European-Union-funded studies, the effects of this close coupling have been examined in several wind tunnel experiments [3,5,6] and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations [3,[7][8][9]. These studies show that the main harmful effects can be traced to a region downstream of the nacelle, between the inboard side of the pylon and the slats, where the flow is reversed (marked blue in Figure 1), and longitudinal vortices are prominent ( Figure 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%