2009
DOI: 10.1080/10862960802695081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stance, Navigation, and Reader Response in Expository Hypertext

Abstract: This article reports on two studies investigating reader stance, navigation, and response in expository hypertext. Subjects in the studies included 69 and 147 adult readers prompted to adopt either an efferent or aesthetic stance when reading a 36-node expository hypertext. Reading was followed by recall and essay writing tasks. Results of the studies indicate that prompts can be designed to induce readers to adopt more efferent or aesthetic stances. Main effects for stance on navigation and the essay response… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences have consequences for the access, comprehension, and uses of text in a wide variety of situations, ranging from education to work to personal and civic purposes. It is therefore crucial to understand and assess the new forms of reading literacy that come with the practice of reading on digital displays (Naumann, 2008;Coiro, 2009;McEneaney et al, 2009;Vázquez-Cano, Mengual-Andrés, & Roig-Vila, 2015).Therefore, digital reading is involved in a great variety of social and personal activities and situations; for this reason, digital texts need a change in methodological approaches in order to improve the competence of digital reading of students (Rouet, 2006;Kennedy et al, 2008;Kemp, 2011;Coe & Oakhill, 2011). Recent studies have identifi ed how profi ciently students navigate is a strong predictor of their learning and performance when reading digital texts (Naumann & Salmerón, 2016;Hahnel et al, 2016).…”
Section: New Technologies For Text New Ways Of Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences have consequences for the access, comprehension, and uses of text in a wide variety of situations, ranging from education to work to personal and civic purposes. It is therefore crucial to understand and assess the new forms of reading literacy that come with the practice of reading on digital displays (Naumann, 2008;Coiro, 2009;McEneaney et al, 2009;Vázquez-Cano, Mengual-Andrés, & Roig-Vila, 2015).Therefore, digital reading is involved in a great variety of social and personal activities and situations; for this reason, digital texts need a change in methodological approaches in order to improve the competence of digital reading of students (Rouet, 2006;Kennedy et al, 2008;Kemp, 2011;Coe & Oakhill, 2011). Recent studies have identifi ed how profi ciently students navigate is a strong predictor of their learning and performance when reading digital texts (Naumann & Salmerón, 2016;Hahnel et al, 2016).…”
Section: New Technologies For Text New Ways Of Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case hypermedia is a format that is becoming more and more prevalent as technology develops (Borsook, 1992). Recent research points to ways hypermedia can be better implemented, and methods for limiting its pitfalls and highlight its strengths are emerging (Strobel, 2008;McEneaney 2009;McNamara, 2005;Lawless, 2007). McNamara (2005) started by identifying the possible relationships between a readers prior knowledge and the cohesion of a hypertext.…”
Section: Hypermediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He discusses the how to help low-knowledge and domain novice readers get the most out of hypermedia and the fact that high-knowledge readers and domain experts don't require as much cohesion. Later, it was shown that prompts or pre-reading activities could be used to change this prior-knowledge and stance of a reader to allow for a greater knowledge transfer, a deeper understanding and more rewarding experience of a give hypertext (Lawless, 2007;McEneaney, 2009).…”
Section: Hypermediamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations