Stand der zementierten Hüftendoprothetik in Deutschland 2010

Fischer, Christian; Kaszap, Balázs; Drexler, Camilla; Lehner, B.; Clarius, Michael

doi:10.1055/s-0031-1298261

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It would be of interest to conduct a larger survey throughout a region or the entire country. The response rate was satisfactory and similar to that in surveys of bone cement usage performed in other countries [7][8][9]23]. In addition, most of the non-respondents were clinical fellows who had less experience and lower caseloads compared to the staff surgeons.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 68%

“…High-viscosity gentamicin-loaded cement was used predominantly in our hospital, in keeping with reports from other countries [7][8][9] and in compliance with recommendations issued by the French National Authority for Health (HAS) [10]. Bone cement must be prepared by mixing its liquid and powder components.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 81%

“…The introduction on the market of cementless prostheses, notably for the hip, does not encourage further training about cementation and may explain the limited experience of surgeons with cement preparation, preparation of bone recipient sites, and cement application techniques. Several surveys about cementing practices were performed over the last few decades in other countries [7][8][9], but no detailed information on cementing techniques used in French hospitals is available.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Bone cement usage modalities at a multi-site university hospital centre

Barral¹,

Lalande²,

Viste³

et al. 2019

Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 68%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 81%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Bone cement usage modalities at a multi-site university hospital centre

Barral¹,

Lalande²,

Viste³

et al. 2019

Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Größtenteils werden in der Hüftendoprothetik normal visköse (mittel-und hochvisköse) Knochenzemente verwendet 4 . Diese haben jedoch den Nachteil, dass sie nach kurzer Zeit aushärten.…”

Section: Knochenzement Zur Implantation Einer Duokopfprotheseunclassified

Knochenzement in der Alterstraumatologie

Köpcke¹

2015

Im OP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zusammenfassung ANWENDUNGEN UND KOMPLIKATIONEN Der Einsatz von Knochenzement hat sich bei der operativen Behandlung von kn?chernen Verletzungen im hohen Lebensalter bew?hrt. Bei der Anwendung von Knochenzement kann es jedoch in seltenen F?llen zu schwerwiegenden Komplikationen kommen. Deshalb ist es wichtig, das Medizinprodukt und dessen Handhabung sowie gezielte Ma?nahmen zur Vermeidung von unerw?nschten Nebenwirkungen zu kennen.

show abstract

Standard and line‐to‐line cementation of a polished short hip stem: Long‐term in vitro implant stability

Morellato

Grupp

Bader³

et al. 2018

Journal Orthopaedic Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current trend is toward shorter hip stems. While there is a general agreement on the need for a cement mantle thicker than 2 mm, some surgeons prefer line-to-line cementation, where the mantle has only the thickness provided by the cement-bone interdigitation. The aim of this study was to assess if a relatively short, polished hip stem designed for a standard cementation can also be cemented line-to-line without increasing the risk of long-term loosening. Composite femurs with specific open-cell foam to allow cement-bone interdigitation were used. A validated in-vitro biomechanical cyclic test replicating long-term physiological loading was applied to femurs where the same stem was implanted with the Standard-mantle (optimal stem size) and Line-to-line (same rasp, one-size larger stem). Implant-bone motions were measured during the test. Inducible micromotions never exceeded 10 μm for both implant types (differences statistically not-significant). Permanent migrations ranged 50-300 μm for both implant types (differences statistically not-significant). While in the standard-mantle specimens there was a pronounced trend toward stabilization, line-to-line had less tendency to stabilize. The cement cracks were observed after the test by means of dye penetrants: The line-to-line specimens included the same cracks of the standard-mantle (but in the line-to-line specimens they were longer), and some additional cracks. The micromotions and cement damage were consistent with those observed in-vitro and clinically for stable stems, confirming that none of the specimens became dramatically loose. However, it seems that for this relatively short polished stem, standard-mantle cementation is preferable, as it results in less micromotion and less cement cracking. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:2736-2744, 2018.

show abstract

Stand der zementierten Hüftendoprothetik in Deutschland 2010

Cited by 8 publications

References 24 publications

Bone cement usage modalities at a multi-site university hospital centre

Bone cement usage modalities at a multi-site university hospital centre

Knochenzement in der Alterstraumatologie

Standard and line‐to‐line cementation of a polished short hip stem: Long‐term in vitro implant stability

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About