2020
DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1847119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stand up, stand out. Feasibility of an active break targeting prolonged sitting in university students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study, results indicated exercise breaks increased vigor and decreased fatigue levels for 20 min compared to no breaks [ 14 ]. A four-minute movement break conducted once in a 2-h lecture was perceived to be feasible and acceptable to students [ 15 ]. However, there is still concern that movement breaks may disrupt concentration and harm productivity [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, results indicated exercise breaks increased vigor and decreased fatigue levels for 20 min compared to no breaks [ 14 ]. A four-minute movement break conducted once in a 2-h lecture was perceived to be feasible and acceptable to students [ 15 ]. However, there is still concern that movement breaks may disrupt concentration and harm productivity [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has also suggested combating the cardiometabolic risks of sedentary lifestyle by incorporating short physical activity breaks to break up periods of prolonged sitting. For instance, when tested in the college classroom setting, active breaks have been found to be both an enjoyable and feasible way to disrupt prolonged sitting time for students (Keating et al, 2020). Creative pedagogical considerations can also be adopted to bring awareness in in-person or virtual classrooms, such as establishing a 1-minute break every hour to get students to stand up and pace on the spot as some activity trackers are programmed to do.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies varied in design and were predominantly feasibility studies (n = 7) and randomised controlled trials (n = 3), with one each of a non-randomised controlled trial, cross-over intervention, single group intervention control and observational (see Tables 1 and 2). Of the feasibility studies, five utilised surveys [51][52][53][54][55] and two mixed methods [56,57]. The eight PAL studies included 4800 participants who were aged between 18 and 28 years.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The six CMB studies included 1197 participants aged between 17 and 25 years mostly enrolled in sports or health science courses [55,57,61,62]. All CMB studies were published within the last four years.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation