2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard and Nonstandard Craniospinal Radiotherapy Using Helical TomoTherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classical approach is to use parallel-opposed lateral cranial fields matched to a direct posterior field. The subsequent development of threedimensional (3D) conformal and intensity-modulated RT has seen these solutions increasingly used to deliver CSI and boost the posterior fossa, [14][15][16][17] and there is increasing interest in proton RT for both conditions, not least as reduced integral doses to normal structures may improve toxicity and second malignancy rates.…”
Section: Clinical Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical approach is to use parallel-opposed lateral cranial fields matched to a direct posterior field. The subsequent development of threedimensional (3D) conformal and intensity-modulated RT has seen these solutions increasingly used to deliver CSI and boost the posterior fossa, [14][15][16][17] and there is increasing interest in proton RT for both conditions, not least as reduced integral doses to normal structures may improve toxicity and second malignancy rates.…”
Section: Clinical Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acute pulmonary toxicity is improved [46]. However, the main difficulty encountered with HT is the fact that a substantial volume of healthy tissues receive low doses (Figure 3) [47,48]. After calculation of organ-equivalent doses, risk of secondary cancers in relationship to the irradiation of organs at risk seems to be higher with HT than with proton therapy [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unique geometry of helical tomotherapy (HT) enables the possibility of treating the entire craniospinal axis without any field junctions or field matching [4]. This feature and other positive characteristics of HT compared to 3DCRT delivery of CSI, such as superior target coverage and a more homogenous target dose, have been reported in the literature [4][5][6], making it an attractive modality for CSI. The disadvantage of CSI with HT is that almost the entire patient is irradiated to some extent, with large volumes of normal tissue exposed to low dose (relative to the target dose).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This so-called dose bath may be associated with acute and late adverse effects, e.g. haematological toxicity and secondary cancers [3,5,[7][8][9][10][11][12]. Thus, even if a HT plan can fulfil typical normal tissue tolerance criteria better than a 3DCRT plan, it does not necessarily mean that the therapeutic result is better as a different spectrum of side-effects might become apparent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%