2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31723-6_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard Compliant Co-simulation Models for Verification of Automotive Embedded Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They state that their approach requires that all the cyber models and the network have the same speed, both internally and in terms of communication step size. According to us, this is due to the first FMI limitation we pointed in section V and consequently acknowledge the need for FMI enhancements [8] proposed to export a SystemC/SystemC-AMS design as an FMU. This approach diverges from our approach because they use continuous designs written in SystemC-AMS.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They state that their approach requires that all the cyber models and the network have the same speed, both internally and in terms of communication step size. According to us, this is due to the first FMI limitation we pointed in section V and consequently acknowledge the need for FMI enhancements [8] proposed to export a SystemC/SystemC-AMS design as an FMU. This approach diverges from our approach because they use continuous designs written in SystemC-AMS.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However it currently does not support well some kinds of cyber models for digital hardware or communication systems where a discrete-event simulator is used (e.g., SystemC (http://www.systemc.org/home) models or network models written in NS-3 (http://ns3project.com/ ns3-simulator/) or SCNSL [3]). There exist different studies on the use of SystemC or other discrete-event languages in FMI co-simulation [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Many of these studies focused on how to make cyber models actually working in interaction with physical models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%