2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard-Fluence versus Low-Fluence Photodynamic Therapy in Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
151
0
13

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
9
151
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in spite of little discrepancy in the protocol, the success rate (about 83.3%) at 1 month on CSC is comparable with the previous outcomes (75-96%) after PDT. 13,14,[17][18][19]23 Our results of decreased choroidal thickness following PDT concur with prior reports. 13,14,16 It resulted from the action mechanism of PDT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, in spite of little discrepancy in the protocol, the success rate (about 83.3%) at 1 month on CSC is comparable with the previous outcomes (75-96%) after PDT. 13,14,[17][18][19]23 Our results of decreased choroidal thickness following PDT concur with prior reports. 13,14,16 It resulted from the action mechanism of PDT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…4,5,[17][18][19] Generally, in lowfluence PDT, a laser light at 689 nm delivered 25 J/cm 2 with an intensity of 300 mW/cm 2 over 83 s. 17,19 Whereas, in our study, the same wavelength laser with 600 mW/ cm 2 intensity as the full dose PDT was applied for 50 s and total light energy (30 J/cm 2 ). However, in spite of little discrepancy in the protocol, the success rate (about 83.3%) at 1 month on CSC is comparable with the previous outcomes (75-96%) after PDT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 Half-fluence PDT is as effective as standard-fluence PDT and may have the advantage of causing lower amount of choroidal hypoxia and nonperfusion over the standardfluence PDT. 16 A study by Kang and Kim 11 evaluating the choroidal thickness changes in spontaneously resolved CSC patients, and in patients treated with half-fluence PDT revealed that the mean choroidal thickness of CSC patients following PDT was similar to the healthy controls. However, in spontaneously resolved CSC patients, the decrease in choroidal thickness was not as much as the PDT-treated patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Nevertheless, PDT carries a potential risk for choroidal ischaemia, RPE atrophy, RPE rip, iatrogenic choroidal neovascularization, and vision loss, even with the generally preferred half-fluence settings. 1,[32][33][34][35][36][37] It has been shown that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels are not elevated in patients with CSC, 38,39 and use of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents has been found inferior to PDT. 40 Therefore, these agents have a relatively minor and controversial role in the treatment of CSC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%