1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf00154486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard for clinical electroretinography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
224
0
18

Year Published

1998
1998
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 517 publications
(246 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
224
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…17,19,36 The photopic flash ERG recorded in the present series was a non-standard, which limits interpretation to comparisons within the subject group. 37 The posterior pole was illuminated evenly by the flashing screen, but the remaining retina was illuminated unevenly with scattered light. The stimulus was below the luminance level for the standard photopic ERG, which is already well below the saturation level for the a-wave.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,19,36 The photopic flash ERG recorded in the present series was a non-standard, which limits interpretation to comparisons within the subject group. 37 The posterior pole was illuminated evenly by the flashing screen, but the remaining retina was illuminated unevenly with scattered light. The stimulus was below the luminance level for the standard photopic ERG, which is already well below the saturation level for the a-wave.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A clinical ERG protocol that conformed to the standard of the International Society for the Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision was performed at both sites [20][21][22]. Scotopic testing included rod responses to short (λ < 470 nm, blue) and long wavelength (λ > 600 nm, red) stimuli matched in intensity to produce equal rod-mediated response amplitudes in normal subjects, as well as a bright white flash (mixed rod-cone response).…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is largely produced in relation to ON-(depolarising) bipolar cell function. [8][9][10] The ISCEV Standard ERG 11 incorporates a rod-specific response to a dim light under scotopic conditions, and a 'Standard; mixed rod-cone response to a bright white flash under dark adaptation. This latter response is dominated by rod function.…”
Section: Electroretinogrammentioning
confidence: 99%