1992
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4686(92)85008-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard Gibbs energies of transfer of univalent ions from water to 1,2-dichloroethane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
126
2
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
14
126
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The automatic ohmic drop compensation was adjusted to 99% of the actual ohmic resistance, which was determined by impedance measurements as the real component of the complex impedance at high frequency. Conversion of the voltage applied to the cell to the interfacial potential difference D [10]. Experiments were performed with either the air-saturated solutions, or the solutions deaerated by argon purging.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The automatic ohmic drop compensation was adjusted to 99% of the actual ohmic resistance, which was determined by impedance measurements as the real component of the complex impedance at high frequency. Conversion of the voltage applied to the cell to the interfacial potential difference D [10]. Experiments were performed with either the air-saturated solutions, or the solutions deaerated by argon purging.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 The hydrophilicity of H þ , Li þ , and Na þ are comparable and K þ is less hydrophilic in the DCE-W two-phase systems, as described above. 29 We might expect a greater interference from K þ ; however, the trends in Figs. 4a and 4b was opposite.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Figure 3 illustrates the influence of the Galvani potential difference on this two-phase reaction when employing different common ions. The Galvani potential difference at the water j DCE interface is set at > 0.59, 0.160, 0.019, À0.225, and < À0.53 V by the ions TPFB À , TMA + , TEA + , TBA + , and BTPPA + , [11] respectively, as shown in Figure 1. It is clear from the color change in Figure 3, as well as the UV/Vis spectra ( Figure S2.1 in the Supporting Information), that the reaction rate follows the order TPFB À > TMA + > TEA + > TBA + > BTPPA + .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%