2010
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.26.2493
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard International Prognostic Index Remains a Valid Predictor of Outcome for Patients With Aggressive CD20+B-Cell Lymphoma in the Rituximab Era

Abstract: The effects of rituximab were superimposed on the effects of CHOP with no interactions between chemotherapy and antibody therapy. These results demonstrate that the IPI is still valid in the R-CHOP era.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
361
4
19

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 519 publications
(399 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
15
361
4
19
Order By: Relevance
“…1975-2012: NHL patients registered, with peak incidence between 40-60 years of age whereas HL with peak incidence between 15-39 years as shown in (Ziepert et al, 2010) analyses from 1,062 patients treated with R-CHOP in three prospective clinical trials (MInT, 380 patients; DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.5…”
Section: Age Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1975-2012: NHL patients registered, with peak incidence between 40-60 years of age whereas HL with peak incidence between 15-39 years as shown in (Ziepert et al, 2010) analyses from 1,062 patients treated with R-CHOP in three prospective clinical trials (MInT, 380 patients; DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.5…”
Section: Age Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muhammad Shahzad Rauf*, Saad Akhtar, Irfan Maghfoor relative comparison against, Saudi cancer registry data (SCR 2009;2010), which is a population-based registry established in 1992, gulf countries data and IARC data. We also did brief retrospective analysis outcome of NHL presented to KFSH&RC and its comparison against international trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with improved outcomes attributed to the addition of rituximab, the identification of a high-risk subset of patients with an anticipated 5-year survival of less than 50% remains a challenge with use of the IPI alone. 1,2 Gene-expression profiling, [3][4][5][6][7] immunohistochemistry-based detection of prognostic biomarkers [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and early interim analysis with positron emission tomography 17,18 following the initiation of immunochemotherapy have all been explored as predictors that may identify high-risk patients. Although promising, many of these methods are costly, difficult to obtain, not easily interpreted and require further validation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, IPI was the strongest prognostic factor for patients who received second-line treatment, providing additional evidence for its validity as a predictor in the rituximab era 28 and outweighing the distinction between early and late relapse. The risk-adapted treatment of this study may have contributed to the equalization in OS of patients with early and late relapse, although the data and the skope of the study do not allow to prove this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%