1997
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1997.177.237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard invariants for crossed products inclusions of factors

Abstract: When N ⊂ M is an inclusion of factors with finite index and a group G acts on N ⊂ M, we compare the standard invariants of N ⊂ M and the crossed product inclusion N G ⊂ M G. The cases when G is a discrete group and when G is a locally compact abelian group are separately considered. Applying to a common crossed product decomposition, we obtain comparison results between the type II and type III standard invariants of an inclusion of type III factors. Introduction.Since Jones [21] initiated the index theory of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first part of the following is already known [33,73]. More examples of fusion algebra homomorphisms can be given related with free product fusion algebras (see Sec.…”
Section: ) Holds Because Lemma 73 (3) Gives H D (Fi' N ) < H D (Y Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first part of the following is already known [33,73]. More examples of fusion algebra homomorphisms can be given related with free product fusion algebras (see Sec.…”
Section: ) Holds Because Lemma 73 (3) Gives H D (Fi' N ) < H D (Y Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This notion gives typical examples of fusion algebra homomorphisms in connection with the type II and type III standard invariants of type III subfactors. Our systematic analysis of fusion algebra homomorphisms covers some results in [33], where the behavior of the standard invariants under simultaneous crossed product was investigated. By using the Kesten invariant and the entropic densities, we also show that amenability and strong amenability behave quite well in non-degenerate commuting squares.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%