Standard of living, consumption norms, and perceived necessities

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to focus on the material conditions of peoples’ daily lives by investigating changes in the self-perceived necessities of ten technology- and leisure-related consumer goods and services between 1999 and 2009. The authors also look at the socio-demographic predictors of the perceptions and the development of the ownership of the goods under investigation. Design/methodology/approach – The data are derived from surveys “Finland – Consumption and way of life” 1999 (N=2,417), 2004 (N=3,574), and 2009 (N=1,202). The statistical analysis methods include ANOVA and descriptive statistics. Also official statistics are used. Findings – Many technological goods, in particular, have become necessities for most people, and the ownership rates have increased notably. Age, type of household, place of residence and gender affected the necessity of most items. Income affected the necessity of expensive goods and services. Practical implications – The ways goods become social decencies does not always follow economic rationalities or are explained by conventional socio-economic determinants. The meaning of life course stage and related daily practices are probably more important than is usually recognized in social studies. Particularly many ICT goods become socially perceived necessities soon after their emergence, which changes the perceptions of adequate living standards, affecting thus the definition of “basic needs” and related social policy. Originality/value – The perceptions of necessities and other measures of living standards have been mainly looked at from the viewpoint of poverty and income. This study explains the perceived necessity of goods and services by several socio-demographic variables.

Does party identification associate with consumer preferences? Analyzing Finnish consumers in 2009 and 2014

“…Different factors are relevant for understanding different types of preferences. For example, some activities tend to associate merely with socio‐economic factors, while others associate with basic socio‐demographic characteristics (e.g., Aro & Wilska, ; Purhonen & Gronow, ; Räsänen, ). Naturally, if possible, the analysis should control for the effects of other possible sources of variation, such as individual or household income, level of education or socio‐economic position.…”

Normality against Sustainability – Mobility practices of well‐to‐do households

“…At the same time, however, it is evident that well-to-do people, whose income is above the average, generally consume more than people with a lower income. Along with consuming and possessing more consumer goods, the well-to-do also regard more consumer goods as necessary in their daily life than others do (see, e.g., Aro and Wilska, 2014;Karlsson et al, 2004).…”

Ageing and consumption in Finland: The effect of age and life course stage on ecological, economical and self‐indulgent consumption among late middle‐agers and young adults between 1999 and 2014

“…However, the life course effects may also be in play, and thus consumption patterns can change when moving closer to the retirement age. Many consumption‐related values and attitudes, such as attitudes towards ecological and ethical issues, have become established as socially desirable opinions during the past decades (Aro & Wilska, ). Thus, recent studies show little variation between age groups or generations in these attitudes (Huttunen & Autio, ).…”