Standard PREanalytical Code Version 3.0

Betsou, Fay; Bilbao, Roberto; Case, Jamie; Chuaqui, Rodrigo F.; Clements, Judith A.; Souza, Yvonne De; Wilde, Annemieke De; Geiger, Jörg; Grizzle, William E.; Guadagni, Fiorella; Gunter, Elaine W.; Heil, Stacey; Kiehntopf, Michael; Koppandi, Iren; Lehmann, Sabine; Linsen, Loes; Mackenzie‐Dodds, Jacqueline; Aguilar-Quesada, Rocío; Tebbakha, Riad; Selander, Teresa; Shea, Katheryn; Sobel, Mark E.; Somiari, Stella; Spyropoulos, Demetri D.; Stone, Mars; Tybring, Gunnel; Valyi‐Nagy, Klara; Wadhwa, Lalita

doi:10.1089/bio.2017.0109

Cited by 39 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These attributes, which are about sample quality and/or pre-analytical information, sample donor-related clinical data, and diseasespecific sample data, are currently listed as possible new MIABIS extensions. However, for sample-specific preanalytical information there are existing standards available, which we suggest to follow: SPREC, 27,28 standards prepared by the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) working group on Technical Specifications for Preexamination Processes (CEN/TC 140), 29 or the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard on Medical laboratories-Requirements for quality and competence (ISO15189). 30 We plan to follow the trend set by previous MIABIS work and to ontologize the MIABIS Sample, Sample donor, and Event components into OBIB.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Extending the Minimum Information About BIobank Data Sharing Terminology to Describe Samples, Sample Donors, and Events

Eklund

Andrianarisoa²,

Enckevort

et al. 2020

Biopreservation and Biobanking

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Extending the Minimum Information About BIobank Data Sharing Terminology to Describe Samples, Sample Donors, and Events

Eklund

Andrianarisoa²,

Enckevort

et al. 2020

Biopreservation and Biobanking

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…52 In addition, the ISBER Biospecimen Science Working Group has developed the standard preanalytical code (SPREC) to facilitate documentation and communication of the most important preanalytical quality parameters of different types of biospecimens used in biomedical research. [53][54][55] This code system was specifically developed for the use in biomedical research, and is therefore rarely applied in HBM studies. To document the quality of a human sample in terms of viability, functionality, structural integrity, and stability, documentation of sample-associated data as well as data related to sample exchanges is essential.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards Harmonized Biobanking for Biomonitoring: A Comparison of Human Biomonitoring-Related and Clinical Biorepositories

Lermen

Gwinner

Bartel-Steinbach

et al. 2020

Biopreservation and Biobanking

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Human biomonitoring (HBM) depends on high-quality human samples to identify status and trends in exposure and ensure comparability of results. In this context, much effort has been put into the development of standardized processes and quality assurance for sampling and chemical analysis, while effects of sample storage and shipment on sample quality have been less thoroughly addressed. To characterize the currently applied storage and shipment procedures within the consortium of the European Human Biomonitoring Initiative (HBM4EU), which aims at harmonization of HBM in Europe, a requirement analysis based on data from an online survey was conducted. In addition, the online survey was addressed to professionals in clinical biobanking represented by members of the European, Middle Eastern and African Society for Biopreservation and Biobanking (ESBB) to identify the current state-of-the-art in terms of sample storage and shipment. Results of this survey conducted in these two networks were compared to detect processes with potential for optimization and harmonization. In general, many similarities exist in sample storage and shipment procedures applied by ESBB members and HBM4EU partners and many requirements for ensuring sample quality are already met also by HBM4EU partners. Nevertheless, a need for improvement was identified for individual steps in sample storage, shipment, and related data management with potential impact on sample and data quality for HBM purposes. Based on these findings, recommendations for crucial first steps to further strengthen sample quality, and thus foster advancement in HBM on a pan-European level are given.

show abstract

“…Fibroblast cultures are analyzed for morphology, proliferation and cell viability. Deviations from SOPs are being documented using the Sample Preanalytical Code (SPREC) [12][13][14] in the biospecimen management system.…”

Section: Quality Assurance Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interdisciplinary Research on Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Longitudinal Collection of Biospecimens and Clinical Data of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Beuthner¹,

Topci²,

Derks³

et al. 2020

Open Journal of Bioresources

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Standard PREanalytical Code Version 3.0

Cited by 39 publications

References 5 publications

Extending the Minimum Information About BIobank Data Sharing Terminology to Describe Samples, Sample Donors, and Events

Extending the Minimum Information About BIobank Data Sharing Terminology to Describe Samples, Sample Donors, and Events

Towards Harmonized Biobanking for Biomonitoring: A Comparison of Human Biomonitoring-Related and Clinical Biorepositories

Interdisciplinary Research on Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Longitudinal Collection of Biospecimens and Clinical Data of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About