2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03758-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard radiological classification of glenohumeral osteoarthritis does not correlate with the complexity of the arthritic glenoid deformity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since many these factors have been shown to complicate surgical treatment or compromise clinical results, the further differentiation of the former grade III into grades III and IV is strongly recommended to allow a better estimation of following procedures and outcomes when assessing humeral osteoarthritis.V. 14 Besides the present study, Linke et al 17 were the only group assessing the relationship between humeral and glenoid OA in patients with primary glenohumeral OA undergoing TSA. Patients and methods differed substantially from our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since many these factors have been shown to complicate surgical treatment or compromise clinical results, the further differentiation of the former grade III into grades III and IV is strongly recommended to allow a better estimation of following procedures and outcomes when assessing humeral osteoarthritis.V. 14 Besides the present study, Linke et al 17 were the only group assessing the relationship between humeral and glenoid OA in patients with primary glenohumeral OA undergoing TSA. Patients and methods differed substantially from our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Contrary to the extent of research on humeral OA and glenoid morphology, the reliability for humeral OA by using the respective classification is high, 15 - 17 while agreement on glenoid morphology may be as low as fair. 18 - 21 In this case, HH characteristics implying information about glenoid morphology could be valuable for treatment decisions and prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, understanding glenoid morphology in the axial plane is mandatory in the final stage of OA for correct implant selection. However, no validated classification has been published to assess Dislocation Arthropathy in the axial plane [ 17 ].…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the KL system is not exclusive to the GH joint, it is a widely accepted tool to standardize the interpretation of arthritis 27 . The SP classification system was originally designed for GH dislocation joint arthropathy but was later revised for general assessment of GH arthritis and remains a favorable tool, given its high interobserver reliability 28 . However, both SP and KL classification systems have conflicting evidence, suggesting they may underestimate the complexity of disease with poor correlation to the degree of glenoid deformity and humeral head subluxation found on CT imaging 27,28 .…”
Section: X-raymentioning
confidence: 99%